It was almost 20 years ago when Ma Jun (馬駿) sat and watched the rainbow-colored Fen River, in China’s Shanxi Province. As he turned to the skies in this coal and industrial heartland of northern China, he could see dozens of chimneys bellowing out their fumes.
He had been sent to the province on an assignment while working as a researcher for a foreign journalist in the late 1990s. The story then was about family planning and its impact on local communities, but it was the devastating pollution he witnessed that filled up his notepad.
It was these notes that would later form the basis of his first book, China’s Water Crisis, which quickly came to signify the awakening of China’s environmental consciousness — compared to Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring in terms of its impact.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
For Ma, now one of China’s most prominent environmental voices, that book and his time along the Fen River was the beginning of a two-decade-long journey in raising awareness of China’s environmental crisis. It is one that has mirrored an ongoing and gradual acceptance within his homeland of the need to tackle the chronic levels of pollution caused by rapid and unchecked industrial growth.
In the past few years, officials have belatedly acknowledged the crisis with a series of reports. The findings confirmed Ma and other environmentalists’ worst fears. One-fifth of farmland is too polluted to grow crops, nearly 60 percent of groundwater is unfit for human consumption and air pollution is 20 times the recommended safe level.
The human cost of this damage has been devastating: huge swaths of productive arable land taken out of food production over fears of rice contaminated with heavy metals; more than 450 so-called “cancer villages,” where untreated or mistreated chemicals have polluted local communities; choking levels of air pollution causing underweight babies; rising levels of lung cancer; and a decline in male fertility.
It is not unsurprising to discover that environmental issues are now the No. 1 cause of public protests in China — overtaking land and labor issues.
After decades of growth at all costs, Ma says China is now at a tipping point.
“The development and growth model of the last 35 years has been increasingly dependent on energy and pollution-intensive industries, but how can we go on growing all these sectors every year with double digits? I think it’s time to change and balance the environment and growth. If we don’t do that, we’re going to suffer a hard landing one day very soon,” Ma said.
China’s leadership has promised a “war on pollution” to regain public trust, but it is the decisions of local government officials, Ma said, that dictate what action, if any, is taken against major polluters.
“It’s the local environmental officials that are in charge of enforcement, but they are subordinate to local government. Their heads are appointed by local government. Those who want to stick to the laws could be replaced. This is the very harsh reality. It won’t be easy to change that,” he said.
What can business do?
This lack of enforcement poses a dilemma to the business community, Ma said.
“When you have a situation where the laws are there, but the enforcement is not quite there, then you’re basically rewarding those who cut corners and hurting those who try to be responsible,” he said. “When I’ve spoken to factory owners, they say: ‘Well look, if I choose to not do this and not discharge the heavy metals, but my neighbors do, then I could be in a difficult situation in the market, because the profit margins are often so tight.’”
“‘And then to add insult to injury,’ the owners say, ‘the big national brands come in and care only about the cost. They just buy from the cheapest. They don’t care at all about the environmental pollution. If we have a high cost, we lose the contract. We collapse. So how can we act in a responsible way?’” Ma said.
For Ma, it is the active participation of citizens that is to be key to forcing local government and industry to act. It was this belief that led him to set up one of China’s most respected non-governmental organizations, the Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs (IPE), in 2006, now backed by funders including the Alibaba Foundation.
From here, he has worked on making official pollution data more easily available to the public, “lifting the veil” on the worst offenders as one commentator described it.
He has already had success in getting multinationals like Apple, Hewlett-Packard, H&M and the Gap to root out the worst polluters from their supply chain in China.
“We can’t go to courts in China, so we have to find alternate ways, like working with brands to try and create a level playing field by identifying the most obvious polluters,” he said.
A much more high-profile success story for Ma and the IPE has been a map and app that allows users to search for pollution violations by company name and location.
The Blue Sky app became an overnight Internet sensation earlier this year after the release of the documentary Under the Dome, which revealed how environmental officials felt powerless to clean up China’s air pollution.
Within weeks, Ma’s app had leaped from 100,000 to 3 million downloads, despite the film being quickly pulled from Internet sites by Chinese officials.
“The aspiration for Blue Sky was to inspire more people to download and use the app, giving them a weapon to clean up polluting factories,” Ma said.
The data behind the app was made possible by the Chinese government’s willingness to make the data from its real-time monitoring of emissions available to the public — a move that surprised many, Ma said.
“For me, there is no better sign of progress than the requirement for the real-time disclosure. The very fact that the government decided to empower the people to join the effort is a remarkable change, although many times it’s not talked about,” he said. “Transparency is still seen as subordinate to regulation, but actually, it is of equal importance. It can drive a different kind of corporate behavior and bypass deep-rooted barriers. It has been proven in the US and Europe. Now it’s our turn.”
For Ma, citizens are the best adjudicators of the growth path China pursues.
“We need to mobilize the people to support them [environmental officials], because the real beneficiaries of what they do are the people. If the people aren’t going to back them, then who else will? Everyone else has some interest in economic growth and development, which often happens at the expense of the environment and community. We need the other side to join this to check and balance,” Ma said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with