Time to reclaim KMT assets
There are similarities between Taiwan and Cuba: Both were renounced by their colonizers, Japan and Spain, in the San Francisco Peace Treaty and the Paris Treaty after World War II and the Spanish War.
After the Spanish War, Cuba enjoyed independence from 1902 to 1959. Cuban leader Fidel Castro took power and associated the country with the Soviet Union in 1959 and served as prime minister until 1976 and then president from 1976 to 2008. The communists confiscated US$1.6 billion worth of US property across the island.
With US President Barack Obama’s new gesture of “openness” to Cuba, ordering the restoration of full diplomatic relations, US corporations and individuals are gearing up to pursue their claims on confiscated property against the Cuban government. There are about 6,000 confiscated assets, estimated to be worth more than US$7 billion, to which US firms and citizens hold claims.
Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) government also confiscated a lot of resources in Taiwan to support its civil war with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in China from 1945 to 1949. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) was defeated and kicked out by the CCP at the end of the war. At that time, the KMT was a broke, down-and-out refugee in Taiwan.
Soon after it took power in Taiwan, just as the communists did in Cuba, the KMT confiscated Taiwanese resources and tax money, manipulated the currency exchange rate, misappropriated public property into the party and formed the KMT Business Management Committee (KBMC) to manage party-run enterprises and monopolize all industries in Taiwan, turning the KMT into the richest political party in the world.
The KMT one-party dictatorship controlled the Republic of China (ROC) government-in-exile since the day it escaped to Taiwan until 2000, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was elected. The interest earned from KBMC assets exceeds US$100 million a year, and the party uses it to lure politicians, bribe voters and trap Taiwan into being an abnormal society.
Prior to 1949, the ROC issued hundreds of millions of dollars in gold-backed bonds and refinanced the foreign debt obligations of previous Chinese governments. However, by 1949, this sovereign debt was all in default in one of the largest sovereign debt defaults of the 20th century, and the bearer bond holders are filing lawsuits against the KMT in US federal courts.
This debt, including accrued interest, now totals hundreds of billions of dollars. ROC law stipulates that the bonds may be repaid when Taiwan and China are unified. However, the law does not state who will repay this debt and what constitutes national reunification. One certainty is that either the KMT/ROC or the People’s Republic of China is liable for these gold bond debts and interests.
The confiscated property in Taiwan was turned into KMT party assets, or “black gold,” and the party uses it to bribe voters, to control business, to manipulate politics and to rule over Taiwan. It became a source of chaos in Taiwan. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) swore to clean it up while running for president in 2008, but all his promises have proven to be empty. Now New Taipei City Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) is playing the same game.
The best lesson we have learned from the Sunflower movement and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) tornado is to honestly and transparently face facts and reality. The KMT is a party of China, not of Taiwan, and is still liable for the gold bond default. The party should pledge allegiance to Taiwan and change its name to the Taiwan KMT if it wants to survive in Taiwan. It is time for Taiwanese to claim the property confiscated by the KMT.
John Hsieh
Hayward, California
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.