Chinese superstitions
With reference to the watch given to Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) by British Minister of State for Transport Susan Kramer at a recent meeting, the British news channel BBC said British officials were not aware that, in Chinese culture, giving a clock implies that the recipient’s time is running out.
Whether this is a taboo in Chinese culture is a matter for Chinese, but in Taiwan — at least a few decades ago — this kind of superstition did not exist.
I remember very clearly how, when we moved into a new house when I was still a child, the gifts offered by relatives included a round wall clock with the text “Congratulations on your new home.” As it hung there on the wall in all its splendor, it offered both joy and practical use, without any negative superstitious connotations.
I also remember how, when coming top in a test in school, my parents gave me a wristwatch to encourage me to treasure time and to continue to work hard.
Doesn’t Ko know that “clock” in Taiwanese is pronounced “jing”, rather than “zhong” as in Mandarin? In Taiwanese then, giving a clock implies that the recipient is clever, quick-witted and capable, and it is thus something very positive, akin to the word “smart.”
At the center of this whole issue is the fact that Ko does not seem to have a clear understanding of the word “Chinese.” When most young people are called “Chinese,” they correct their counterpart, but Ko is not that sensitive.
When a reporter told him that some people feel that it is taboo for Chinese to give a clock, Ko should have said: “That’s a matter for the Chinese, it is not a taboo in Taiwan.”
Shen Cheng-nan
Taichung
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with