Religion and politics have much in common. Within both exist different arguments and creeds.
From a scientific perspective, religion is a classic example of a “constructive world,” as it creates a set of principles by which it interprets the world and everything in it. At the same time, it is a “virtual world,” consisting as it does of purely subjective philosophies and ideas that are difficult to replicate or prove, especially when it comes to concepts such as life after death. This is why many religions resort to complex, intricate rituals or theologies to prove the existence of a god or gods.
Malaysia is a Muslim country. To visit it is certainly to come with being intrigued by a call to prayer resounding from the mosques dotted throughout the country. Muslims pray five times a day, facing Mecca, and once a year observe the holy month of Ramadan. However, non-Muslims living in Malaysia can also worship their own gods. Those in the Indian community can observe their Hindu beliefs and Shiva worship.
It is only in religiously diverse countries such as Malaysia that it can be observed how religions construct their own worlds, and how these are mutually exclusive. That is to say, a person cannot believe in both Buddha and Allah. As a result, mutual respect and peaceful coexistence are very important founding principles within religiously diverse countries, for without them disaster would ensue.
Taiwan at election time is like a microcosm of its domestic politics, and it is at election time that it becomes most apparent just how much like a religion politics here has become. It is a little excessive to say that people cannot trust a certain political party or candidate, but if it is seen as a religion, then the sentiment can be understood.
If politics in Taiwan really is like religion, then it is a classic constructive world — even a virtual world. Everything that happens in politics at this time, all of the election activity, is anti-intellectual, exclusive and unprovable. Therefore, all the political parties and candidates are essentially engaging in religious activity, albeit in a bid to gain power. They have no need to account for themselves, or to offer evidence for the points of faith they peddle, they just need their “political followers” to believe them.
Just before the election, a candidate from the south said in one ad that if he were to be elected, he would create 200,000 jobs and raise the starting salary of young people to NT$32,000. If economics were really that simple, and if he were able to deliver on his campaign promise, he would be a shoo-in for the Nobel Peace Prize in Economics. And yet you hear this kind of thing over and over in Taiwan.
Taiwanese politics is already very much like a religion and for this reason rational debate about it is impossible. For many candidates, the point of campaign rallies is to create religious events. They are held to allow their supporters — their believers — to bolster each other, to give vent to their emotions and to have a cathartic, reaffirming experience.
Talk of the Republic of China (ROC) being consigned to oblivion, or promises of donating huge sums of money to a city should a certain person be elected mayor there, are akin to promising: “He who believes in me, even though he dies, will live.”
It is pure fantasy, it is constructing a world that does not exist, and yet, people should still respect different beliefs, though there is no need to respond to expressions of divergent beliefs. Mutual respect and peaceful coexistence should be applied as a founding principle for politics in Taiwan.
The main reason for the state of politics in Taiwan is the failure to establish an honest, rational and just society. Another reason is that the “political rate of return” for candidates is excessive should they be elected, so parties and candidates think they can do as they please.
People have to rise above their superstitions and not let themselves fall prey to pernicious doctrines. They need to rely instead on becoming enlightened and wiser, and on the steady development of civil society. The development of civil society of such a high caliber is a long way off. All that can be done is to ask, when people vote, that they first put their religious beliefs to the side. If they do, it will bring untold benefits for the future and the next generation.
Huang Der-hsiang is a professor in the Graduate Program of Professional Development in Education at Dayeh University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with