Tue, Nov 11, 2014 - Page 8 News List

Abe, Xi: How much can they really achieve?

By Ralph Cossa

The guessing game continues as to how meaningful discussions were yesterday between Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on the sidelines of the APEC leaders’ meeting in Beijing.

Prior to the summit, a handshake is about the only thing the two sides were willing to guarantee. Both sides professed a willingness to meet, but China made it clear that an extended conversation would only occur “under the right conditions.”

These conditions were clearly spelled out by Beijing: First, a pledge by Abe to stop visiting the controversial Yasukuni Shrine, which honors, among 2.5 million others, the spirits of 14 World War II “Class A” war criminals. Second, an acknowledgment by Tokyo that the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) — known as the Senkakus to Japan — occupied and administered by Japan, but claimed by China (and Taiwan), are indeed disputed territory.

The Abe administration made it clear that the prime minister, as a matter of conscience, is not prepared to publicly announce that he would forego future visits to Yasukuni Shrine, but several of his emissaries have reportedly provided private assurances to the Chinese suide that he would refrain from future visits. Washington and Seoul would be equally pleased if this is true. Abe’s visit to the shrine in December last year resulted in a public expression of “disappointment” from Washington and considerably stronger admonitions from Beijing and Seoul.

The island dispute is more problematic. In an era when legal opinions trump strategic thinking, no leader seems prepared to acknowledge the existence of a dispute over territory currently under his nation’s control. Beijing, while insisting that Tokyo admit a dispute exists over the East China Sea islands, is equally adamant that no dispute exists when it comes to the Paracels [Xisha Islands, 西沙群島] — seized by China from Vietnam by force in 1974 — while claiming that all islands, reefs, and rocks within their infamous “nine-dash line” in the South China Sea are “indisputably” Chinese territory.

Likewise, Russia and South Korea claim respectively that the so-called Northern Territories (southern Kuriles) and Dokdo (called Takeshima by Japan), are indisputably theirs, even though Tokyo lays claim to both. Moscow in the past has at least been willing to discuss the issue with Tokyo, although the current Ukraine situation has made a summit between Abe and Russian President Vladimir Putin problematic.

When it comes to the Diaoyutais, China claims that the two nations agreed in the 1970s to shelve the dispute for future generations to resolve; Beijing said it would like to put the issue back on the shelf (once Tokyo acknowledges the dispute). Beijing also blames the nationalization of three of the islands in 2012 as the source of the current problem.

However, Tokyo said that Chinese fishing boats and government escorts have been increasingly assertive in the East China Sea since 2010, culminating in the ramming of a Japanese Coast Guard ship by a drunken Chinese fishing boat captain in September of that year.

Tokyo also said (with some justification) the 2012 nationalization of three of the islands was aimed at preserving, not changing the “status quo” and that the purchase was necessary to keep the islands out of the hands of right-wing nationalists who would have started erecting structures on the currently vacant islands. In truth, prior to 2012, four of the five islands were in private Japanese hands and one was under government control. Now, four are owned by the government and one is private; the ratio changed, but the overall status did not; all five were under Japanese administrative control before and all remain under Japanese administrative control now.

This story has been viewed 2912 times.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top