On Oct. 13 in the Legislative Yuan, the Mainland Affairs Council appeared to reverse its stance on whether the Dalai Lama would be able to visit Taiwan, saying that the government would consider granting permission if it was convenient for both parties.
On Oct. 23, however, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Wu Yu-sheng (吳育昇), who has a close relationship with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), said that “since both sides of the [Taiwan] Strait belong to China...” a visit by the Dalai Lama to Taiwan could be considered “a return to China.”
Today, when the idea that the Republic of China (ROC) could have any claim over China has become ridiculous, how is it that Wu feels he can say what others dare not?
The Dalai Lama has visited Taiwan three times: In 1997, during former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) term; in 2001, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was in office; and in 2009, after Ma took office.
The Dalai Lama met the then-president on his first two trips, but Ma prevaricated, and he did not meet the Tibetan spiritual leader. Their paths did not even cross.
In 2009, when Typhoon Morakot devastated the nation, Ma initially refused all international assistance from everywhere except China, eagerly anticipating help from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), although in the end it was the US military that came to the nation’s aid.
Closely following this, not three weeks later, Ma agreed to a visit by the Dalai Lama — which China was not happy about — from Aug. 30 to Sept. 4 to offer consolation to the victims of the disaster.
Even though the invitation was originally extended by politicians affiliated with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Ma approved the visit late the same night the offer was made. The speed at which he changed his mind was truly startling, and the factors at play in the background are similarly intriguing.
Then-Mainland Affairs Council minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said that he did not think this would be harmful to cross-strait relations. However, the Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) said Beijing was very concerned about the Dalai Lama’s motivation for this particular trip, and canceled many exchanges as a result.
Clearly, there was a lot of bad feeling between the two sides. Given this, the Tibet Religious Foundation of His Holiness the Dalai Lama — the default liaison office of the Tibetan government-in-exile in Taiwan — said that Ma was able to resist this kind of interference demonstrated his spirit and courage.
Anyone familiar with the incidents surrounding the Tunghsing Building and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) would know that the only time Ma demonstrates courage and grit is when it is in his own best interests to do so.
Why, then, would he risk sticking his neck out like that? Perhaps it was because, having revealed his intention to involve the PLA, he had to do something to atone for having caused alarm over security with Japan and the US.
However, Ma did not admit defeat over PLA involvement. Instead, he allowed China’s State Administration for Religious Affairs director Ye Xiaowen (葉小文) to come to Taiwan on Aug. 28, two days prior to the Dalai Lama’s visit. They held a press conference to much fanfare, and then went to Nantou County to take part in a special ceremony for Morakot victims.
Ma did nothing of the sort for the Dalai Lama, canceling the international press conference. He allowed him to hold a ceremony for the disaster victims, but he did not allow him to speak about Buddhist teachings, and unleashed crowds waving the Chinese flag, protesting against the Dalai Lama’s trip to Taiwan.
The reason Ma created this situation, taking the senior Chinese official to the ceremony and bringing in the hecklers, might well have been to mitigate China’s irritation.
On Sept. 29 this year, Ma indicated that his support was leaning toward China. On Oct. 10 — National Day — he, rather provocatively, urged China to move toward liberal democracy, for which the TAO, on Oct. 15, issued a stern rebuke.
In a single week, Ma called three national security meetings, ostensibly to address the ongoing food safety issue, something that is quite unprecedented: Clearly, something else was afoot.
There is little doubt that Wu’s statement that a visit by the Dalai Lama would be tantamount to “a return to China” was an example of Ma expressing his position to Beijing by proxy, and his position is that the constitutions in both China and Taiwan are crystal clear: That Taiwan is the exclusive property of China.
Of course, governing a country requires balancing the interests of all parties, but this also needs careful planning. Ma’s insistence on doing things his own way, of proceeding at full throttle and then dealing with problems as they arise, is going to lead to disaster for the nation and for East Asia.
HoonTing is a political commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
The Comedy Club on Fuxing N Road in Taipei was vandalized with paint bombs mixed with feces on May 29, allegedly because one of its performers had satirized Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The incident has triggered concerns about the growing threat from China’s cross-border repression within Taiwan. On the day of the attack, a comedian surnamed Huang (黃), who is known for mocking Xi, was the headline performer. The Comedy Club founder said the assault was obviously politically motivated. China, which Freedom House said “conducts the most sophisticated, extensive and far-reaching campaign of transnational repression in the world,” has
China’s Taiwan Affairs Office spokesperson Zhu Fenglian (朱鳳蓮) at a press conference last week repeated the same, tired line, claiming that Taiwan’s future should be “decided jointly by the more than 1.4 billion Chinese people, including Taiwan compatriots.” The statement is absurd. Virtually every word is incorrect, with some parts mistaken to an astonishing degree. First, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never included Taiwan. When the Republic of China’s (ROC) original five-colored flag was established in 1912, Taiwan was still under Japanese rule. When the PRC was founded in 1949, Taiwan was under the control of president Chiang
Following the outbreak of conflict in Iran, TikTok was flooded with videos targeting Taiwanese users. Many featured artificial intelligence (AI)-generated anchors posing as Taiwanese broadcasters with localized traditional Chinese subtitles. The videos warned of imminent social collapse due to liquefied natural gas shortages, blamed the Democratic Progressive Party and its alleged failed energy policies for a fabricated crisis, and used recycled footage from unrelated events to create the impression Taiwan stood on the edge of systemic breakdown. By saturating the information environment with falsehoods or selectively edited material designed to trigger emotional responses, malign actors can exploit cognitive vulnerabilities and
Taiwan’s leading position in the global semiconductor industry is not, as some claim, based on misconceptions, a result of “stealing.” It was built upon formal, transparent and costly technology transfer agreements between the Taiwanese government and US enterprises half a century ago. According to the oral history of Hu Ding-hua (胡定華), a pioneer in Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, the origin of Taiwan’s integrated circuit (IC) technology dates back to the “IC pilot factory” in the 1970s. The implementation of this project fully complied with international commercial standards and legal procedures. First, the project completed formal contract signing and payment. In 1975,
RSS