Whenever a politician visits a monument to honor a special person or event, there is always the possibility of controversy, because in history there are often at least two sides to a story. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei mayoral candidate Sean Lien’s (連勝文) visit to the 228 Memorial Park in Taipei on Friday upset some people, as he observed a historical event — Retrocession Day — while paying no mind to the victims of the 228 Massacre commemorated at the park.
On the anniversary of Japan’s handover of Taiwan to the Republic of China (ROC), when then-chief executive of the ROC forces Chen Yi (陳儀) accepted Japan’s surrender in Taipei on behalf the Allies in World War II in 1945, proclaimed as Taiwan Retrocession Day the next year, Lien paid his respects to four historical figures he regarded as great contributors to the nation. He laid flowers at their bronze busts in the park, including that of Lien Heng (連橫), a historian, author of A General History of Taiwan and his great-grandfather.
As Sean Lien left and was asked why he did not visit the 228 Memorial Monument, which is also in the park, he said it was not on his planned schedule, while his campaign office later said that Lien would pay homage to victims of the 228 Incident some other time.
The 228 Incident refers to the brutal military crackdown that began on Feb. 27, 1947, following civil protests that were the culmination of public indignation sparked by the repressive and corrupt KMT regime since the ROC forces took control over the nation, and led to a huge death toll and the breakup of families.
Either unintentionally or purposely, paying a visit to the 228 Memorial Park in commemoration of Retrocession Day without stopping at the 228 Memorial Monument to remember the 228 Incident was unkind to the victims and their families. However, it could be a carefully calculated electoral strategy to win back undecided voters in the pan-blue KMT camp.
Previous election results have shown that Taipei voters favor the KMT by a 55-45 ratio, if not a 60-40 ratio, making victory difficult for a pan-green candidate in a mayoral election if it is not a three-way race, such as in 1994, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) won thanks to a split KMT.
With little more than a month until the election, several public polls have shown that independent mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) has been leading Lien by double digits in electoral support, attributed to a large portion of pan-blue supporters who have not yet decided for whom to vote and could end up defecting to Ko or choosing not to vote on Nov. 29.
Retrocession Day was a good opportunity for Lien to call for unity in the pro-China ranks. By paying tribute to the four historical figures to highlight the historical links between Taiwan and China, Lien sent the message that furthering ties is something voters can expect from him if he is elected. His snub of the 228 Incident during the visit may have been calculated to accentuate this message.
In the same vein as his recent appeal to military personnel, civil servants and teachers — traditional pan-blue voters — that they will see their preferential benefits slashed if Ko wins the election, and his attempt to characterize Ko as a diehard supporter of Chen, Lien has spun an ideologically partisan message by scheduling the visit to the 228 Memorial Park.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify
RSS