It is a story that has played out worldwide: Internet adoption reaches critical mass, changing how business is conducted and creating billion-dollar markets for digital goods and services — and causing massive “creative destruction.” Now China is to experience this phenomenon — only, in China’s case, it comes amid broad economic transformation and rapid social change.
The collision of these forces could transform the world’s second-largest economy.
With 632 million users, China’s Internet has already produced a dynamic technology sector, thriving social networks and the world’s largest e-tail market. Global investors’ excitement about the initial public offering of China’s largest online retailer, Alibaba, reflects the scale of the economic value that has already been created.
However, most of the action has been on the consumer side. Key sectors, from manufacturing to healthcare, have not moved past the early stages of the shift online. As of 2012, only about one-quarter of China’s small and medium-sized enterprises had started to use the Internet in areas like procurement, sales and marketing — meaning that the most sweeping changes lie ahead.
As traditional industries increase their Web use, they streamline operations, find new methods of collaboration and expand their reach through e-commerce — all of which accelerate productivity growth.
The McKinsey Global Institute projects that new Web applications could enable as much as 22 percent of China’s total GDP growth through 2025.
The Internet can also boost transparency and trust. E-tailing, for example, began with a cash-on-delivery model. However, over time, online payment platforms gained Chinese consumers’ trust, paving the way for explosive growth.
Other industries are beginning to follow suit. Online real-estate databases match buyers and sellers faster, while reducing price premiums stemming from information asymmetries. Such platforms have been created for land auctions and foreclosures, as well as private transactions.
Similarly, China’s nascent used-car market stands to benefit from the Internet revolution, as e-commerce boosts the transparency of vehicle listings and transactions and new online tools help lenders acquire and analyze credit histories in a more detailed and sophisticated way.
Of course, building a trust-based system is no easy feat. Much of the Internet’s commercial potential stems from data collection, sharing and analysis, which are fraught with privacy concerns.
Even though Beijing established preliminary rules governing online privacy in 2012, many gray areas remain, including basic issues such as the types of information companies can share, how that data can be used and what constitutes consumer consent.
In addition to clarifying the legal framework for data sharing, Beijing can set an example by using the Internet to render its own data collection and transaction records more uniform and systematic. Moreover, by making some of its own data sets publicly available, it can accelerate an open-data movement and pave the way for the emergence of related industries.
For Chinese firms, such a movement would have to be accompanied by a fundamental change in mentality. Instead of focusing on large-scale, one-size-fits-all production, firms must use the data they receive to glean detailed insights about consumers’ wants and expectations — and expand their portfolios to include the niche products that consumers crave.
Given that the Internet empowers consumers to compare offerings directly and choose the most economical and attractive option, firms that attempt to adhere to business as usual will quickly be overtaken by their competitors. Of course, such intense competition will erode firms’ profit margins — a trend that they can offset by integrating Web technologies into back-office functions and logistics.
Another shift to be expected is that the most innovative and flexible — not necessarily the largest or most established — enterprises will be the most successful. The Internet enables startups to scale up rapidly and at a low cost, unburdened traditional methods of doing business, while blurring the lines between sectors.
As a result, new players can emerge suddenly to challenge long-established institutions. Nowhere is this more apparent than in banks’ current scramble to defend their territory from online financial-services providers.
The Internet revolution will also disrupt the labor market, with some jobs being automated into obsolescence and companies facing a shortage of technologically proficient workers. A company’s success will depend on its employees’ willingness to acquire new skills, undertake new roles and adapt to the faster pace and unfamiliar demands of the digital marketplace.
However, the onus of adaptation does not rest entirely on workers. Policymakers and business leaders must ensure that displaced workers have options for retraining and that the education system is producing enough technologically savvy workers.
The Internet will not only create economic momentum for China in the years ahead: It will help to transform an unsustainable growth model based on fixed investment and cheap labor. By unleashing the economy’s potential, the Internet can help China reach its goal: developing a growth model that can lift the nation to high-income status.
Jiang Qiping is secretary-general of the Information Research Center at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Jonathan Woetzel is a McKinsey and McKinsey Global Institute director in Shanghai.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with