In the past few years, prices have been rising across the board. The only thing that has remained constant is Taiwanese salaries. This is a nightmare for the general public that will not go away — living in Taiwan these days is not easy.
Taiwan, of course, is not alone in being engulfed by this wave of price increases. For the past three summers, I have spent one-and-a-half months in Temple City in Los Angeles, California, another place where prices are high. Based on this experience, I can confidently say that — whether it is gas stations, hypermarkets or restaurants — prices in the US are clearly also going up.
However, simply looking at the rising prices of the same or similar products is not sufficient, it is also necessary to look at individual incomes.
For simplicity’s sake, let us equate US$1 to NT$30. The average individual income in the US is a little over twice that in Taiwan, so comparisons made using this income structure showcase a world of difference in the misery index for people in Taipei compared with those in Los Angeles.
The price for a gallon (3.78 liters) of regular gasoline in Los Angeles hovers around US$4, with small fluctuations. When converted, this amounts to about NT$31.7 per liter. Not only is this far from twice as expensive as in Taiwan — it is even cheaper than gasoline in Taiwan, and let us not forget that car owners in Taiwan must also pay an additional fuel tax. It is self-evident in which direction the misery index is heading for car owners in this country.
When it comes to Taiwan, a country that is sometimes called the “Kingdom of Bananas,” everyone knows how much a bunch of bananas costs at the supermarket. At the Valu Mart store in Temple City, there is a special offer on the fruit every Wednesday when fresh bananas are sold at US$0.99 for 3 pounds (0.45kg). That is equal to NT$13.4 per taijin (0.6kg) in Taiwan.
Given that other supermarkets also have occasional special offers on bananas, sometimes as low as the equivalent of NT$8 per taijin, perhaps Taiwan should lose its alias “Kingdom of Bananas.”
Other products such as cantaloupe melons, weighing about 2kg, are sold for US$0.99, and four to six ears of corn can be bought for the same price.
That would be unthinkable to most Taiwanese.
Moving on from fruit to meat, beef is cheap, there are no two ways about it. How about pork? At 99 Ranch Market, pork tenderloin goes for a little less than NT$120 per taijin. Also, a loaf of bread is about NT$50.
Compare that to prices in Taiwan.
Now, let us consider eating out. A plate of sweet and sour pork at a Chinese restaurant in Los Angeles, including tax and tips, is about NT$230, and a serving is about twice as big as a serving in Taiwan. Dim sum is about NT$50 a plate, and a serving still contains three beef balls or sesame balls.
Again, compare that to prices in Taiwan.
Lunch for elementary-school students is free for children from disadvantaged families, and low-income families only pay about NT$0.6 to NT$0.7 per meal.
One last time, compare that to Taiwan.
It is obvious that rising costs, which are not matched by increasing salaries, are causing ever more difficulties for Taiwanese, and bringing up a family in the nation is becoming tougher.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with