Taiwan is suffering another setback in the US as the nation’s solar companies face heavy penalties in the latest anti-dumping probes that originally targeted Chinese solar manufacturers, making Taiwan a victim of US-China trade disputes.
The US Department of Commerce on Friday last week imposed preliminary import tariffs ranging from 27.59 percent to 44.18 percent on Taiwan’s major solar cell makers. A final decision is expected in December. The tariffs are much higher than the 20 percent estimated by local research house TrendForce Corp.
However, Taiwan does not hamper competition practices in the US market. Taiwanese solar firms do not sell their products at prices lower than the cost level in the US and the government does not provide any subsidy to enhance their cost-competitiveness.
Taiwanese firms are to be fined primarily because they provide cost-efficient solar cells and modules to their Chinese customers, which has put their “plan B” into action in preparation for future stricter penalties.
Taiwanese solar exporters face an average of 35 percent in import tariffs on solar cells, solar panels and solar modules shipped to the US.
This is higher than the 29.3 percent tax rate on China’s major solar module maker Trina Solar and the 30 percent rate first levied on most Chinese exporters in 2012.
Only a few small-scale Chinese solar companies must pay import tariffs of 165.04 percent based on the Commerce Department’s verdict.
Now, the question is whether the department’s latest ruling will effectively protect US solar cell manufacturers, such as SolarWorld, from price competition from overseas, mainly from China.
Clearly, the answer is “no.” China’s major solar cell and module makers will be able to export more solar products directly from China to the US, probably carrying a higher price tag.
The ruling is more likely a compromise, as US solar operators are concerned that higher-priced solar products might bring up costs of installations.
Besides, there are government forces involved in the China-US talks, but Taiwanese solar companies, lacking such government backing, must fight for their interests by themselves.
In an emergency press conference yesterday, the Taiwan Photovoltaic Industry Association called on the government to provide immediate assistance including professional knowledge and negotiation support in the upcoming talks, aiming to reduce the proposed import tariffs on local firms before the final determination is made in December.
“We are good at making solar cells, but we are not professional negotiators... We hope the government will form a task force to help us,” Neo Solar Power CEO Sam Hong said.
To minimize the impact from the duties, the association yesterday said it would offer a price hike of at least 12 percent to the US Commerce Department in exchange for tariff cuts.
“We have to try everything to find a way out,” Hong said.
He said about 20 percent of Taiwan’s solar cell output was shipped to the US via Chinese customers last year.
The government has not done enough to safeguard local companies’ interests. It needs to play a more active role in solving trade problems as anti-dumping and anti-trust suits become regular occurrences.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with