The vast majority of the 23 million residents of Taiwan regard themselves as Taiwanese and they overwhelmingly reject Chinese annexation of the nation. The Sunflower movement that started with the occupation of the legislature on March 18 by college students and spread rapidly to many sectors of Taiwan’s civil society vividly attests to this.
Taiwan’s situation is precarious. The military balance has clearly shifted in favor of China. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) under President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is collaborating with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to surrender Taiwan, by signing a peace accord with Beijing. To this end, Ma is pressing for a meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at an APEC meeting in November. Because the KMT controls both the executive and legislative branches of government and the mass media, Taiwan’s citizens have few means to resist this momentum toward absorption by China, despite the 500,000-strong protest against the passing of the ill-conceived service trade agreement with China.
If Taiwan was to fall by Chinese military coercion or internal subversion, the US would suffer a geostrategic disaster. The sea lanes and airspace around Taiwan are critical to the survival of Japan and South Korea. Once in control of Taiwan, China would be in a position to pressure Japan and South Korea to become its vassal states. It is most likely that Chinese acquisition of Taiwan would trigger a chain of events resulting in China’s hegemony over East Asia.
The preservation of Taiwan as an independent democracy is in the interests of the US and its democratic allies in Asia precisely because Taiwan’s democracy is a thorn in the side of the CCP.
Taiwan is a beacon of hope for those Chinese who aspire to a more open society with rule of law, freedom of expression and religion, and in which people can freely elect their officials and representatives at all levels of government.
Taiwan’s experience disproves the fallacy that democratic values are incompatible with Asian culture. An independent Taiwan hinders China’s projection of power into the Pacific and Indian Oceans, and safeguards the vital sea lines between Japan and South Korea, so the preservation of Taiwan’s freedom contributes directly to the peace and stability of East Asia and beyond.
Assuming that Washington has the wisdom to realize the importance of Taiwan’s freedom to peace and stability of East Asia and ultimately to the security of the US homeland, what can the US do to preserve Taiwan’s de facto independence from China?
First, the US should make clear its position that the so-called People’s Republic of China government has no legitimate sovereignty over Taiwan. Washington should reiterate the US policy that the future of Taiwan must be resolved peacefully and with the express assent of Taiwanese.
Second, US President Barack Obama’s administration should work with Congress to speed up the sale of advanced fighters and other weapons needed to resist a People’s Liberation Army invasion of Taiwan.
Washington should also initiate high-level contacts between the militaries of the US and Taiwan, to boost Taiwan’s morale and readiness and to help counter any subversive activities within Taiwan. Such exchanges could include port calls by US navy ships.
Third, the US should actively assist Taiwan in reducing its excessive economic dependence on China. Bringing Taiwan into the Trans-Pacific Partnership at an early stage would help.
The acquisition of Taiwan would propel China toward expansionism and eventual conflict with the US.
“Taiwan’s security is ultimately America’s security as well,” late US representative Gerald Solomon said.
Former US president Woodrow Wilson, in a speech before the US Senate in January 1917, proposed a doctrine: “That no nation should seek to extend its policy over any other nations or people, but that every people should be left free to determine its own policy, its own way of development, unhindered, unthreatened, unafraid, the little along with the great and powerful.”
The US should be brave enough to uphold this principle of self-determination for the people of Taiwan, because doing so is ultimately in the US’ best interest.
Former British prime minister Winston Churchill once said the US would eventually do the right thing, but not before exhausting all other possibilities.
In engaging the People’s Republic of China, the foremost objective of the US should not be to avoid Beijing’s displeasure, and the US’ security should not be dependent on China’s goodwill.
Let us hope that the US will do the right thing, sooner rather than later, as the cost of complacency and delay will be high.
Li Thian-hok is a freelance commentator, based in Pennsylvania in the US.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS