Tuesday marked the 27th anniversary of the lifting of martial law, which ended the era of authoritarian rule in Taiwan and put the nation on the path of democratic reform. However, as a result of the nation’s failure to institute transitional justice over the course of its democratization, a poisonous residue of authoritarianism lingers on.
The absurdity of this was highlighted this week in a campaign by a group of high-school students from prestigious schools such as Taipei Chenggong High School, Taipei Municipal Jianguo High School, Taipei First Girls’ High School and National Tainan Girls’ Senior High School, who co-produced and released a video calling for the removal of Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) statues from all campuses nationwide.
“Although Chiang made contributions to the Republic of China, he imposed martial law and the ‘White Terror,’ severely violated human rights and repressed democracy and freedom,” the students said in the video. “Why does Chiang’s statue still stand at schools? The man denied the people democracy, freedom and human rights. Why should people pay respect to him?”
Indeed, with rhetoric from politicians often touting democracy as the nation’s greatest achievement and preaching the importance of democratic values, too few push for the discarding of authoritarian ideas and values to consolidate a national conscience on democracy.
As such, nearly three decades have passed since Taiwan became a democracy, yet statues honoring a dictator who was also the main culprit behind the 228 Massacre continue to stand tall and proud in all corners of the country, with many campus buildings, public spaces, streets and local districts named after him.
This ridiculous ubiquitous presence suggests the nation’s sense of transitional justice remains lacking. The statues of the main instigator of the White Terror era stand as an insult to the sacrifices made by Taiwan’s democracy pioneers; these statutes also serve as a striking irony to the very democratic achievements hyped by the nation’s political leaders.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), for one, has often trumpeted his administration’s achievements in advancing the nation’s democratic development and has expressed hopes that all educators in Taiwan would help the public better understand the lessons of history and to cherish human rights.
If Ma is at all serious with his words, he should take the students’ campaign as an opportunity to acknowledge them for understanding the importance of transitional justice, echo their call to eradicate totalitarian worship and encourage remembrance of those who resisted dictatorship, rather than remembering the dictators.
Unfortunately, not only has Ma kept mum, the increasing crackdowns and violence by the state apparatus against civilians under his presidency these past years have bred concerns from human rights groups over what they perceive as regression of human rights in the country.
Taiwan’s democracy has often been touted as a success story, and it is indeed a major asset to the nation that all Taiwanese should be proud of.
However, in light of the Ma government paying mere lip service to democracy, the students’ video campaign comes as a timely reminder to all Taiwanese that a lack of action for transitional justice is preventing Taiwan from becoming a healthy and mature democracy.
Members of the public collectively must therefore not sit in complacency, but need to be very wary and watchful to consolidate our fragile democracy.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS