This year marks the 120th anniversary of the beginning of the First Sino-Japanese War and the 100th anniversary of the beginning of World War I. It is also the 64th anniversary of the outbreak of the Korean War. Trying to build a new international order following China’s rise is creating a multitude of problems and a warlike atmosphere.
The import of the hacker attacks on Hong Kong media outlets and the Web site for Hong Kong’s online “referendum” on “true universal suffrage” must not be underestimated. It is almost certain that this was the action of Chinese hackers, because the organizations that were attacked had no quarrel with ordinary people, but challenged China’s authoritarian rule. The attempts to resist the incursions have sparked an Internet war.
Matthew Prince, CEO of Cloudflare, a US Internet services company trying to help Hong Kong’s civic society, is personally watching over defensive operations and has finally succeeded, earning the gratitude of many Hong Kongers.
Prince told reporters that the attackers change strategies and use technologies that have never been seen before, including large volumes of encrypted data and a network of hundreds of thousands of computers distributed across the world. It is estimated that the scale of the denial of service attacks is at least twice the measured 300Gb per second. The largest previous attack was 400Gb per second.
PRC hackers are allocated a budget. About a year ago, the US said they were primarily from People’s Liberation Army Unit 61398, which has its main base in the Pudong New Area in Shanghai. About a month ago, the US Department of Justice announced that it would file lawsuits against five PLA officers for stealing US commercial secrets on behalf of the Chinese government. All five belong to Unit 61398.
In 1999, two Chinese air force colonels, Qiao Liang (喬良) and Wang Xiangsui (王湘穗), published a book titled Unrestricted Warfare (超限戰). They revealed the PLA’s interest in warfare without parameters, saying neither national borders, cyberspace, international law, national law, codes of conduct nor ethics were restrictions. At the time, Internet warfare was a new concept, but they said it could be foreseen that this threat would bring greater harm to the US than to other countries.
In an article discussing Internet warfare in the June issue of the Chinese-language Chengming Magazine (爭鳴雜誌), the author said Beijing’s cyberattacks on the US were mainly directed at the economic sector and accessing technological secrets. Possibly due to fears of retaliation, infiltration of the military sector has not been as advanced, but another reason could be hacker technology is unable to break the US military’s Internet defenses.
China’s recent “Internet purification” is part of preparations that have lowered domestic resistance to Internet war with the US. Relying on German and Swiss technology, China has had a breakthrough in the development of quantum networks.
Hong Kong is now the epicenter of a cyberwar between China and the US, and it looks as if the US has the upper hand. As the US and China engage in close cyberwar combat, one cannot help but think that perhaps the US and European countries should engage in some self-reflection. After all, multinational companies in these countries have helped China improve its Internet technologies in recent years simply to make a profit.
Taiwanese media outlets have also been attacked, but the government has said nothing. By welcoming China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Minister Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) and canceling first lady Chow Mei-ching’s (周美青) visit to Japan, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has made it clear which side he is on.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
RSS