After World War II, Taiwan made the transition from the Japanese to the Chinese era and the China of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
After 1949, the KMT’s China existed only in Taiwan, while the five-starred red flag flew over the territory that was the foundation of its Constitution. In 1971, the nation lost the right to represent China in the UN.
The reason that the KMT of China became part of Taiwan and that Chinese culture became a part of Taiwanese culture was that colonizers are transitory; like the wind, they come and they go.
Japanese culture was absorbed into Taiwanese culture because it remained here when the Japanese left. The same thing will happen to Chinese culture.
Not all Chinese in Taiwan were members of the KMT and not every member of the KMT was high up in the party’s chain of command. Some Chinese became Taiwanese, and some Taiwanese became KMT members and even became part of the KMT hierarchy.
In an era when literature was used as a tool to disseminate government policy and ideals, there was some literature that did not fit the mold of the literary establishment that entered Taiwan from China after the war.
Author Kenneth Pai’s (白先勇) father, former minister of national defense Pai Chung-hsi (白崇禧) was a member of the Guangxi Faction, which was not very much liked by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石).
In Taiwan, he was lonely and marginalized by the regime. This was also the reason why he never had to shoulder any of the political responsibility for the imposition of martial law and the authoritarian era.
His misfortune turned out to be a benefit, because without it, the world might never have had the chance to appreciate Kenneth Pai’s literature. The book Healing the Pain: General Pai Chung-hsi and the 228 Incident (止痛療傷:白崇禧將軍與二二八) by Kenneth Pai and historian Liao Yen-po (廖彥博) contains deep historical insights.
The younger Pai’s collection of short stories Taipei People (台北人) describes the sentiments felt, and the loneliness of the families of government officials after the KMT was routed and fled to Taiwan in 1949.
Another collection, The New Yorker, describes his experiences living in a foreign land, as he stayed in the US after his studies.
These collections portray the atmosphere among young Taiwanese after the war — including those who entered Taiwan after 1949 — who sought to study at National Taiwan University and then go to the US.
The characters and situations portrayed in his books cover both the US and Taiwan, and recently a play based on his novel Crystal Boys (孽子) toured Taiwan.
Loneliness and feeling unwanted are key themes in the writer’s novels, and while socialists and moralists may be critical, the work of Kenneth Pai has become popular in Taiwan and China — just as Eileen Chang’s (張愛玲) works have become popular in both nations — because they are situated on the fringe of politics and portray spiritual exile.
These kinds of novels contain more truth than history books that are manipulated by the KMT.
They prove that poetry speaks more truth than historical fact. This kind of literature will continue to exist even after the KMT has turned Taiwanese history on its head.
Taiwanese must know about this politically marginalized literature and poetry if they are going to be able to see the faces and hear the voices of those who live their lives in the darker corners of society.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that