Students are known for their terrible eating habits, but few have diets as strange as Peter Bickerton, whose recipes for homemade locust burgers and waxworm tacos have been translated into Italian, Indonesian and Arabic as they do the rounds on the Internet.
Bickerton has become famous as the guy who eats bugs, but this is no party trick — Bickerton began eating insects after a serious health scare in his family.
“My uncle died of a heart attack when he was 45, and then three months later my other uncle, Michael, had triple bypass heart surgery,” Bickerton said.
A family history of heart disease put Bickerton at an increased risk of the condition, which is related to high levels of cholesterol. After his mother discovered that she too had high cholesterol, she started taking statins. However, Peter decided to try something different.
Bickerton, a doctorate student in plant sciences, started reading about the nutritional value of insects. He discovered that insects were high in protein, contained less saturated fat than meat and were more environmentally friendly to produce than beef, lamb and pork.
“Insects are extremely efficient at converting feed to body weight,” said Arnold van Huis, professor of entomology and lead author of Edible Insects, a report by the UN Food and Agriculture Agency released last year. “If you take a cricket for example, it only takes 2.1kg of feed to produce 1kg of edible body weight. To produce one kilogram of beef, you need 25kg of feed.”
It is this staggeringly efficient conversion that makes the UN want to put insects on the menu. By 2050, Earth’s population is expected to rise to 9 billion, to feed all these new arrivals, the world will need to produce nearly twice as much food as we do today.
Insects are already part of the diets of 2 billion people worldwide: Crispy fried beetles are a common street food in Thailand, caterpillars are a popular snack in sub-Saharan Africa and grasshoppers are fried in garlic and eaten in parts of Mexico. However, in the West, the idea of eating insects fills people with disgust; they are fed to squirming celebrities on our reality TV shows.
The disgust reaction protects us from things that might carry parasites and disease, according to “disgustologist” Valerie Curtis, an expert on hygiene and behavior at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
“Humans have a rule of thumb, which is only ever eat what your mother feeds you,” Curtis said.
Disgust, like culture, is passed down from generation to generation.
It can be a powerful thing. While it might be a way to avoid disease, disgust can guide manners and behavior and even politics.
“Many issues like flag burning or sexual violations stimulate disgust,” said Paul Rozin, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, who is working on the psychology of resistance to eating insects.
Despite its power over our lives, there are ways to overcome disgust. If people were entirely governed by it, they would never try new things. However, changing the eating habits of billions of people is quite a challenge. After all, getting people to try something that they find disgusting is hard enough, let alone a whole culture.
Despite this, it has happened before. Lobster used to be so abundant along the east coast of the US and Canada that it was seen as a poor man’s food.
“Lobster shells about a house are looked upon as signs of poverty,” John Rowan wrote in 1876 after a trip to Nova Scotia.
Today, lobsters are often the most expensive item on the menu.
“One way food transitions take place is that food comes to be labeled very high-status,” Curtis said. “Maybe if insects could become precious delicacies and sold as something incredibly expensive, it would then percolate its way through society.”
In March in east London, a pop-up food restaurant called Grub served insects in Hoxton Square for one week only. The food was prepared by a Thai chef, and the menu boasted dishes such as curried beer tempura grasshoppers.
Grub’s founder, Shami Radia, said that while sustainability is important to him, he knows he is not going to sell the food on its environmental credentials alone.
“It doesn’t matter how sustainable it is, if it doesn’t taste good, no one’s going to eat it,” he said.
Reviews of the food were positive, and the price was high at £36.50 (US$61.50) a head.
“The thing I enjoy the most is watching someone that hasn’t eaten insects before. When they take a bite, their facial expressions change from real dread, to a little bit of surprise, and then to delight,” Radia said.
Maybe to convince the world to eat insects, a bit of reverse psychology needs to be employed. Like the lobster, if insects were prepared by elite chefs and consumed by the super-rich, then maybe everyone would want a slice of the locust pie.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with