On April 23, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) left a greeting card for former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄), who refused to see the president because he was on a hunger strike. In the card, Ma wrote that after a thorough safety check on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant conducted by local and international experts, its fate would be decided by the public in a referendum. Was this a unanimous agreement reached following discussion between the Atomic Energy Council and Taiwan Power Company?
The phrase “strict safety check ... conducted by local and international experts” is vague, because we are unable to test the safety of the plant in Gongliao District (貢寮), New Taipei City, in a magnitude 7 earthquake.
If non-destructive inspections are done, an overall check could take more than three years and such inspections are often unfeasible. Some safety checks can only be done after installing nuclear fuel rods for a start-up test, but then the nuclear power plant may already have been contaminated by radiation and there would be no turning back.
An engineering problem can be overcome, but this takes a lot of time and money. Let us therefore examine the issue from another perspective: What if the construction project were completed?
The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is actually the last of its kind in the world, and its designer, General Electric (GE) Co, is unlikely to sell this kind of nuclear unit again. Since the basic design of the Taiwanese unit is similar to that of the Japanese Fukushima Dai-ichi plant, nobody dares purchase such a unit. Today, the GE’s two existing units of this kind are in Japan and are the only such units in the world. They are functioning well so far. When a massive earthquake hit Japan on March 11, 2011, authorities stopped the operations of the two units temporarily, for safety checks and quickly resumed the operations when no damage was reported.
However, the original GE design of the two units was altered by Hitachi, Toshiba Corp and other Japanese companies, and even GE is unaware of all the changes. That being so, the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is a guinea pig with no framework to follow.
Since its construction has been outsourced to different companies, future maintenance work may be difficult. If special parts needed to be replaced, it would not be possible to purchase them. Thanks to its world-class heavy industry, Japan is able to produce any special parts needed for nuclear power units by itself, but Taiwan is incapable of doing this. The fourth plant might someday have to stop operating if it cannot be repaired or spare parts purchased. This is something that would probably happen very soon.
If Taiwan abandons the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant now, perhaps it could turn the plant into a natural gas plant. Because of the discovery of shale gas, the price of natural gas is unlikely to increase in the foreseeable future and this energy source has many other advantages. The use of natural gas, then, could end this 17-year nightmare.
The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant has been repeatedly delayed for more than a decade. Finally, the horrific consequences of the 2011 Japanese nuclear crisis gave us a chance to review the issue, and this must be due to the blessing of the sea goddess Matsu (媽祖).
Since the construction project was initially launched by a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, it would be fortunate for the public if the current KMT government could take the initiative to terminate the project by itself.
Hsieh Horng-ming is a nuclear engineer who has participated in the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to