By now everyone has realized young people in Taiwan desperately want to be heard. It appears that the three-week-long Sunflower movement, during which students and protesters talked about their vision for the country inside the legislative chamber and on the streets outside, was not enough.
Since the students’ withdrawal from the legislature on April 10, various open-air forums have been organized nationwide for participants to vent their anger against President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration, frustration about their prospects for the future and anything else they want to say.
These creative forums are derived from the “Jianmin Liberation Zone” (賤民解放區) which was organized by a breakaway group with a different ideology from the main Sunflower movement leadership and staged outside the legislative compound during the occupation.
The first event in Taipei was named the “Bowel Blossom Forum” (大腸花論壇). Organizers nationwide quickly copied the idea and decided to give the event different names — such as “Fish Intestine Blossom Forum” (魚腸花論壇) in Tainan and “Bowel Cake Forum” (大腸餅論壇) in Taichung.
In this arrangement, using a few tables, a sound system and equipment for online broadcasting, hundreds, sometimes more than 1,000 participants at a time are able to have their 15 minutes of fame, speaking to the crowd about whatever they want. It is reminiscent of London’s Hyde Park, where speakers traditionally stand on soapboxes to debate politics, religion and other issues in Speakers’ Corner. Londoners have been gathering in Hyde Park to debate the issues of the day since the 19th century.
The speeches in Taiwan, given not only by students but also professors and others, were always passionate and energetic, but the most attention-grabbing aspect was that the speeches were laden with profanities. There also tended to be all-you-can-drink beer to help participants better enjoy the atmosphere.
While police in every city were deployed to prevent the activities from developing into something unimaginable, they usually watched in silence.
Occasionally things got a little out of control, such as on Saturday night when entertainer Cheng Chia-chen (鄭家純) — better known as “Chicken Cutlet Girl” (雞排妹) — took off her bra and reveled in cheers from the crowd.
That the forums were able to generate momentum in almost every major city on the west coast served as a warning to the Ma administration, which by now should be able to see how frustrated Taiwanese, in particular the young, are about the direction the country is going six years into Ma’s tenure.
When public policy is not being discussed in a substantial way in the legislature, mainstream public opinion is never respected by the government and people are unable to do anything to disrupt the “status quo” or bring down elected officials they see as unqualified to represent them, perhaps all they can do is release their anger in profanity.
Intriguingly, none other than Su Beng (史明), who is known for his devotion to socialism, Taiwanese independence and a decade-long effort to overthrow the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime, by military means if necessary, said it best when he told participants in the forum on Saturday night that “it took more than profanity or violence” to bring down the KMT.
“We are Taiwanese who have our own integrity and way of doing things. We should never lose sight of our goal,” the 97-year-old said.
That is a lesson for the participants to learn after they are done with the profanity-filled speeches and the forums. It must have felt good to lambast the government in no-holds-barred remarks, but it will take determination and effort 10 times that shown by the Sunflower movement to put the country back on the right track.
Only when that goal is achieved will the open-air forums go down as a memorable chapter in history.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with