The Sunflower movement has left Taiwanese society feeling as if it has survived a magnitude 8 earthquake. It will alter Taiwan’s political and social landscape forever.
This process was created by every citizen who participated in the protests, as well as by our friends abroad. The strange thing is that regardless of how strong the impact of the Sunflower movement has been or how deadlocked we may have seemed at times, the Chinese government seemed completely unmoved, calmly taking it all in from a distance.
However, on April 11, the day after the students ended their occupation of the legislative chamber, China made some mysterious statements.
In the space of just a few hours, Taiwan was enveloped in rumor and conjecture: China is changing its “representatives” in Taiwan; President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is stepping down and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) is taking over; China is asking Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) to mediate and help patch things up between Ma and Wang; China is giving Ma and his gang a slap in the face; China thinks Ma cannot even handle a bunch of little kids; China is using the protests as an opportunity to tell the Taiwanese that it is easier to deal with China than with Ma and his cronies, all in an attempt at winning over the Taiwanese; China does not need a “representative” here, because all it has to do is open its mouth for Taiwan’s politicians to change focus and dance to China’s tune.
These theories might be reasonable and rational or not, but what we should pay attention to is not conjecture and conspiracy theories based on projections of what China might do. What is even more curious about the situation is that this time, Taiwanese media and the Taiwanese have been more concerned with China’s attitude than at any other time in the past.
As soon as someone in China issued a statement, it was met with a cacophony of commentary, guesses and theories. In addition, the mighty “opaque mother country” on the other side of the Taiwan Strait could change its tune at any time it pleased, which only served to double or quadruple the conjecture and rumor.
Yet as we pointed at each other and said that this or that person stood to gain, there was always the sense that all our rumor-mongering and speculation had unwittingly opened up Taiwan to the voice of Chinese officialdom and invited it to play a starring role in our political wrangling.
The unpredictable, opaque nature of the politics of this situation gave Chinese voices a better vantage point and more leeway than even the Ma administration was capable of, placing it ahead of Taiwan’s political forces and allowing it to gain more than anyone else from the situation and consolidate its position as “big brother.”
As the number of cross-strait agreements continue to increase, this trend will only increase.
The cross-strait service trade agreement has not yet been passed and China is already crossing the water and spreading its political shadow over Taiwan. Can we really afford to ignore the political nature of relations with Beijing?
Lin Hsiu-hsin is an associate professor of sociology in the Department of Humanities and Social Sciences at National Chiao Tung University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with