Central Bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) has been given the top “A” rating from Global Finance magazine 10 times. To show support for the cross-strait service trade agreement, he recently released Perng’s Version of the Service Trade Agreement for Dummies. However, careful scrutiny of this information pack reveals some critical mistakes.
The first mistake is to compare Taiwan with South Korea. Perng says that the signing of free-trade agreements (FTA) has boosted South Korea’s business with FTA partners to 36.1 percent of its total trade, compared with a mere 9.3 percent for comparitive trade in Taiwan. However, 75.3 percent, 56.6 percent and 53.6 percent of Taiwanese exports to the US, Europe and China, respectively, are tariff-free, not to mention all Taiwanese exports to Hong Kong and Singapore. Taiwan’s exports are concentrated on IT products whereas South Korea in addition to exporting IT products also exports cars, ships, iron and steel. In other words, Taiwan might not be marginalized even if it does not sign FTAs or agreements on trade in services or goods. Perng’s information pack, then, is likely to mislead.
Next, Perng says that the 264 Chinese professionals who have been allowed to work here temporarily by January had hired 9,624 Taiwanese employees, so that each Chinese professional had created 36.5 jobs in Taiwan. This is laughable. The fact is that Taiwanese businesspeople have launched over 2,000 investment projects in China since signing the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), and more than US$45 billion (about NT$1.37 trillion) has flowed to China. The number of Taiwanese workers thrown into unemployment after their factories were closed down may be 10 times the number of jobs Chinese professionals have created. Why are young people facing high unemployment rates or receiving low starting salaries of NT$22,000 per month? The signing of the service trade agreement may worsen the problem.
Finally, Perng’s sudden display of concern for Taiwan’s flat-panel industry is confusing. Currently, China imposes a 5 percent tariff on flat-panel imports. According to Perng, if South Korea enjoys zero tariffs after signing an FTA with China later this year, while Taiwan is still subjected to the 5 percent tariff, as many as 100,000 workers in the flat-panel industry could lose their jobs. Exactly who should be held responsible for the decline of this industry? It is, in fact, a result of Taiwan’s exchange rate policy. When the financial tsunami hit Asia in 2008, South Korea quickly depreciated the Korean won by 34.6 percent from 936 to 1,258 won for one US dollar, while the value of the New Taiwan dollar remained unchanged as the central bank adhered to President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) policy of maintaining a strong NT dollar. As a result, South Korea took advantage of Taiwan, and the nation’s four largest flat-panel manufacturers have suffered badly. The nation’s DRAM manufacturers have also suffered from this policy. Yet it is not too late if the Central Bank wants to resolve the predicament. It could immediately depreciate the NT dollar by 5 percent to NT$32 for one US dollar, which would bring temporary relief to the 100,000 workers in the flat-panel industry.
Having a world-renowned central banker is not necessarily a good thing for Taiwan, as he is no longer subject to criticism, perhaps causing him to lose self-discipline. US economist Alan Greenspan served as chairman of the US Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, and the world praised him when he left office. However, once the US subprime mortgage crisis turned into a global financial crisis, the tolerance of financial derivatives during his chairmanship was said to be the cause of the crisis. Taiwan should learn from the US.
Huang Tien-lin is a former national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with