Turkish Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk has described the situation in his country as “going from bad to worse and even towards terrible” following the government’s attempts to block access to Twitter, as a phalanx of writers from Zadie Smith to Gunter Grass line up to state their “grave concern” about “the freedom of words” in Turkey today.
The authors, who also include Salman Rushdie, Margaret Atwood, Karl Ove Knausgaard and fellow Nobel laureate of Grass and Pamuk — Elfriede Jelinek, have added their names to a joint letter from PEN International and English PEN.
PEN is a worldwide association of writers. It called the ban on Twitter announced two weeks ago “an unacceptable violation of the right to freedom of speech.”
The Turkish government restricted access to the micro-blogging Web site, and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan indicated the ban could be extended, saying he would not “leave this nation at the mercy of YouTube and Facebook,” and pledging to “take the necessary steps in the strongest way.”
On Thursday, he appeared to follow up that threat as Turkish media reported that the country’s telecommunications authority had blocked YouTube as a “precautionary administrative measure.”
The latest curbs came hours after an audio recording of a high-level security meeting was leaked on the video-sharing Web site. Turkey previously banned YouTube in 2007, but lifted the ban three years later.
According to PEN, the Twitter ban remains in place despite an administrative court order on Wednesday ordering its suspension pending a court judgement.
Pamuk, who won the Nobel prize for literature in 2006, not long after Turkish state prosecutors had charged him with “insulting Turkishness” for remarks he made to an interviewer, told the Guardian “there were times in Turkey when free speech was equally bad ... as in 2008 when YouTube was closed, but at that time we were at least hopeful about the future. Not now. The situation here is going from bad to worse, and even towards terrible.”
Pamuk’s translator, Maureen Freely, the new president of English PEN, added: “The real worry, I think, is that Erdogan now seems to have the power to do whatever he wishes, whenever he wishes. And that is why we’re so concerned about what he’ll do next, to silence dissenters and crush opposition wherever he sees it.”
The signatories to the letter point to the fact Turkey ranks 154th among 180 countries on the World Press Freedom Index, saying that even today, “translators, editors, publishers, poets and writers face criminal proceedings and even imprisonment for legitimate expression under a variety of legislative fetters.”
PEN particularly highlighted the case of Muharrem Erbey, a human rights lawyer and writer who was arrested in 2009, and who is in prison awaiting trial. PEN believes the charges against the author are politically motivated, and that Erbey is being held because of his alleged affiliation with Kurdish political parties.
In their letter, the writers — from Turkey and around the world — are asking Turkey’s leaders “not to retreat from democracy and its keystone, freedom of speech; but rather to recognize their obligations under international treaties and to lift the block on Twitter.”
“We urge them to remember that this beautiful country will be stronger and happier when, and if, it appreciates pluralism, diversity and the freedom of words,” they write. “We welcome the administrative court in Ankara’s decision to suspend the [Twitter] ban ahead of a full judgment and urge the telecommunications authority to restore access to Twitter immediately.”
Author Elif Shafak, also tried for “insulting Turkishness” following the publication of her novel The Bastard of Istanbul, is one of the authors to sign the letter.
“Turkey’s rulers need to understand democracy is not solely about getting a majority of votes in the ballot box,” said Shafak, whose trial went on for a year before charges were dropped. “Far beyond that, democracy is a culture of inclusiveness, openness, human rights and freedom of speech, for each and every one, regardless of whichever party they voted for. It is the realization of the very core of democracy that has been sorely lacking in Turkey today.”
The letter comes in the wake of a new report from PEN International and English PEN on the Gezi Park protests last year, and their impact on freedom of expression.
“The excessive use of police force, as well as widespread media censorship and reprisals against journalists and users of social media, starkly illustrated the shortcomings of Turkish democracy in its lack of pluralism and disregard for fundamental rights and freedoms,” the report says.
It lists the “human rights violations” that took place during the protests and calls on the Turkish government to, among other things, ensure freedom of expression is respected and peaceful protestors are not detained.
PEN International and English PEN also wants the right to peaceful assembly included in Turkey’s proposed new constitution.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with