March is the month of spring, a joyful season welcomed by all. However, in March 1947, Wu Hsin-jung (吳新榮), an intellectual and a physician, wrote a tragic poem of destroyed dreams amid Tainan’s salt fields: Who would have thought that a flood would arrive in March?
At a time like this, we should discuss history.
The 228 Incident in fact occurred on Feb. 27, 1947, but it was only on the next day, on Feb. 28, that it began to spread like wildfire. The Taiwanese, who at first welcomed the arrival of Chinese, but had then been forced to wake up from that dream, protested in anger throughout Taiwan — from north to south, from east to west.
At the time, Taiwan’s chief executive and garrison commander Chen Yi (陳儀) pretended to play along with the intellectuals who, still hoping for democracy and a high level of autonomy for the nation, tried to mediate and reconcile the parties as the protests were going on. In the end, the intellectuals were also slaughtered. In March, under the pretext that rebellion had broken out in Taiwan, Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) sent support troops from China. In their bloody suppression of protests, they paved the way for the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) flight to Taiwan after being defeated by the communists in China.
Wu described the suppression by the Chinese nationalist army as a flood, an occurrence that left him with three sorrowful questions: “When will we be able to rebuild our homeland? When will our people be able to stand up again? When will this society be reborn?”
It is easy to see that Taiwanese intellectuals, who had harbored hopes with respect to China, were deeply disappointed.
The slaughter that began with the 228 Incident can be seen as a deliberate elimination of the Taiwanese elite that had developed during the Japanese colonial era and remained in Taiwan. The chilling White Terror during the 1950s was directed at eliminating reds, leftists and communist sympathizers. Among these, a large part was made up of Chinese intellectuals who had followed the KMT into exile, although the greatest part was made up of Taiwanese.
The KMT was drenched in blood. It had carved an indelible mark on the altar of history to consolidate its rule. Although the 228 Incident is remembered and compensation has been paid, and although compensation has been paid for the White Terror, that was all done by a Taiwanese president or, in other words, by one member of the victim group to other victims. After President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) restored the KMT regime to power, this remembrance and compensation became an ironic part of history.
Sixty-seven years ago, in March 1947, the KMT was preparing to suppress and purge Taiwan of protesters. The reason the Taiwanese bowed down instead of standing up in defiance was a political ailment: a collective sense of frustration.
Spring was arriving, but it was not a spring of life and joy, it was a spring of death and tragedy. It was in March that the spirit of Taiwan was drowned in the deluge.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Ahead of US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) meeting today on the sidelines of the APEC summit in South Korea, an op-ed published in Time magazine last week maliciously called President William Lai (賴清德) a “reckless leader,” stirring skepticism in Taiwan about the US and fueling unease over the Trump-Xi talks. In line with his frequent criticism of the democratically elected ruling Democratic Progressive Party — which has stood up to China’s hostile military maneuvers and rejected Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework — Lyle Goldstein, Asia engagement director at the US think tank Defense Priorities, called
A large majority of Taiwanese favor strengthening national defense and oppose unification with China, according to the results of a survey by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC). In the poll, 81.8 percent of respondents disagreed with Beijing’s claim that “there is only one China and Taiwan is part of China,” MAC Deputy Minister Liang Wen-chieh (梁文傑) told a news conference on Thursday last week, adding that about 75 percent supported the creation of a “T-Dome” air defense system. President William Lai (賴清德) referred to such a system in his Double Ten National Day address, saying it would integrate air defenses into a
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS