In 2012, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said Taiwan would join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) within eight years.
Only now, after having procrastinated for two years, has he taken action toward that aim by ordering the Cabinet carry out the preparatory work necessary to seek membership in the TPP and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) next month.
He has also ordered former vice president Vincent Siew (蕭萬長) form a group that the opposition parties will take part in to promote partnership among the public.
This flurry of activity is clearly related to the visit of Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) to Taipei last month.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) recently sent delegations to Tokyo and Seoul to observe the strategies Japan and South Korea adopted when negotiating the TPP, the RCEP and other free-trade agreements. The party’s China Affairs Committee is also expected to make its stance on the matter clear in an upcoming report.
The TPP and RCEP are more than international trade pacts. Beneath the surface, they are part of a political struggle between the US and China, the two major powers in the Asia-Pacific region.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the DPP face pressure from Washington and Beijing, and it will be hard for them to keep things going just by making declarations. They each need to take concrete action and face up to their many challenges.
First, Taiwan will not be able to take part in the first round of TPP talks between 12 nations. Even if Taiwan were able to participate in the future, the rules of the game will have already been established and Taiwan will be at the mercy of the other participating countries, having to accept the high demands of total market liberalization and zero tariffs.
A few years ago, the Ma administration overlooked the importance of public opinion and communication with the legislature and decided unilaterally to ease the nation’s reopening to US beef imports, a move that badly damaged its reputation.
Last year, the service trade agreement signed with China was full of backroom deals.
Since TPP negotiations would involve the adoption of a confidentiality agreement, it is highly doubtful whether the Ma administration will be able to communicate honestly and openly with the opposition and industries that could be affected if Taiwan joins the trade group.
Second, Ma is now widely viewed as incompetent and as a lame duck president. At the end of this year, he will face the pressure of local elections.
It must be asked whether he really has what it takes to get involved in such a difficult task, or is he merely toying with the US and going to leave the real problems to whoever succeeds him?
If Washington demands that Taiwan open up its pork market in exchange for entry into the TPP, would the Ma administration have the guts to make such a promise?
After Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe assumed office for the second time, he used his strong public support to quell domestic opposition to the TPP by leading his party in two landslide victories in the Diet. At the same time, he sang the same tune as US President Barack Obama. In February last year, he signed a guarantee for five sensitive industries, assuring that they would not be liberalized if Japan joins the TPP.
Despite this, US-Japanese negotiations on the TPP ground to a halt last month.
Under former South Korean president Lee Myung-bak, South Korea witnessed strong domestic protests over the signing of a free-trade agreement with the US, but at least Seoul was able to get Washington to open up its automobile industry to South Korean companies. After South Korean President Park Geun-hye took office, she saw that Japan was working for TPP membership and has followed suit, expressing an interest in joining the group.
South Korea has always kept its wits about it, and, before deciding to join the TPP, the country signed free-trade agreements with seven of the countries that will be involved in the upcoming round of TPP talks, while gaining an abundance of experience from the negotiations.
The South Korean National Assembly also passed the Trade Procedure Act and requested that the government submit an assessment report and periodically hold public hearings and consultations with it.
The Japanese and South Korean experiences clearly show that the ability of leaders to handle pressure, skillful political maneuvering, a stable legal foundation and a certain amount of transparency are the only ways to guarantee success in foreign trade talks.
The only question remaining for Taiwan is whether the Ma government is equipped with these skills.
Liu Shih-chung is the director of the Democratic Progressive Party’s International Affairs Department.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with