South Korea and Australia recently signed a free-trade agreement (FTA) that will come into effect in 2015. It is the 11th FTA that South Korea has signed with another country.
Now that the deal has been cilnched, it is almost certain that officials from President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government, along with many other observers, will come out and make specious statements about South Korea stepping up the pace of trade liberalization and how this means that the cross-strait service trade agreement must not be postponed any further.
These statements will be followed by demands that the agreement must be passed by the legislature with the utmost urgency.
However, South Korea’s latest FTA is not the only piece of news that Taiwan should be paying attention to. Seoul’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy announced this month that according to import data released by Beijing, as of October, the value of South Korea’s exports to China stood at US$150 billion, while exports from Japan into China were worth US$133 billion.
Figures for the last two months of the year are not yet finalized, but it seems likely that South Korea is set to overtake Japan and become China’s largest source of imports. Taiwan, on the other hand, is third on the list with exports to China worth US$130.6 billion.
It is worth comparing South Korea with Taiwan.
South Korea has yet to sign an FTA with China, while the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) between Taiwan and China has been in effect for more than three years. Back when the Ma administration was evaluating the benefits of the ECFA, it emphasized its view that Taiwan would have the advantage of gaining access to Chinese markets at an earlier stage than Japan or Korea, and that this would allow Taiwan to replace these countries in the Chinese market.
It is therefore worthwhile to consider three important questions: How is it that although Seoul has never signed an FTA with China, South Korean products have been able to gain such widespread access to the Chinese market?
Why has the Ma government failed to deliver on promises that Taiwan would catch up with and overtake South Korea and Japan in the Chinese market?
Why is it acceptable for Ma to promote the cross-strait service trade agreement with China before any real review of the policy and its effects has been conducted?
In simple terms, the Ma government has no idea how to stimulate the Taiwanese economy, and it simply wants to rely on China and is prepared to concede benefit after benefit to cover up its pitiful political performance.
The government is unwilling to face up to the tendency of China to suck the lifeblood out of Taiwan nor face the changes that have occurred as the industrial relationship between the two nations has moved away from Taiwan representing the upstream with China the downstream toward a reality where China has replaced Taiwan.
At the end of the day, where Taiwan really lags behind is not in the number of FTAs signed with other countries, but in the foresight and ability of those leading this country.
Huang Tzu-wei is a researcher at the Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Drew Cameron
China took advantage of the vacuum left behind when US carriers stayed out of the western Pacific Ocean due to COVID-19 outbreaks on several US Navy warships. The Chinese government is solidifying its hold on artificial islands in the South China Sea by moving in missiles and surveillance equipment, and formalizing its occupation by creating two municipal districts in the region under Hainan Island’s Sansha — Xisha District on Woody Island (Yongxing Island, 永興島) to administer the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands, 西沙群島) and Nansha District on Fiery Cross Reef (Yongshu Reef, 永暑島) to administer the Spratly Islands (Nansha Islands, 南沙群島) —
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) yesterday wrapped up its annual party conference-cum-national decision-making forums in Beijing: the National People’s Congress (NPC) and National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), known colloquially as the “two meetings.” They are normally tightly choreographed affairs, designed to project an image of stability and unassailable strength, but several events leading up this month’s sessions provided strong indications that all is not well in the state of Denmark. The first sign of major discontent came in March, at the height of the COVID-19 crisis in China, when an article by real-estate tycoon Ren Zhiqiang
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a