Taiwanese companies have to get rid of their “me too” mindset because many industries have entered a new era of cut-throat competition. This means an end to the business model adopted by many firms of competing with rivals by offering large discounts for near-identical products. They need to develop more winning strategies.
Boosting research-and-development efforts to keep pace with industry trends is one crucial measure. Although talk of increasing R&D spending and personnel is not new, only a few companies put it into practice as it is a long-term investment and takes time to see results.
Hon Hai Group, which owns the world’s biggest electronics manufacturing service provider, Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, understands this more than other local manufacturers. Hon Hai last week unveiled a plan to invest US$40 million in R&D facilities in the US and to develop high-end facilities for goods, including high-margin components for telecommunications equipment and Internet servers.
Hon Hai’s decision to build facilities in the US may initially seem unusual, as most Taiwanese manufacturers opt for low-wage countries when they move overseas. However, analysts consider Hon Hai’s move to be a smart decision as the investment will help the firm shift to high-margin products and break away from its previous business model of squeezing profits from making low-margin products in China.
Hon Hai Precision Industry, which makes iPhones and iPads for Apple, has seen early returns from its efforts to boost R&D, as the company posted impressive gross margins of 7.07 percent for the quarter ending Sept. 30. The figure far exceeded the 4.2 percent of local contract laptop-computer maker Compal Electronics and the 4.48 percent of contract notebook maker Quanta Computer.
The manufacturing sector will continue to exist in the post-PC era, but it needs to transform and move beyond hardware manufacturing to turn profits and continue to grow, as Hon Hai chairman Terry Gou (郭台銘) has said.
Strengthening R&D capabilities is the most basic step local companies can take. The most important is that they abandon the mindset of merely following the leading international companies.
MediaTek’s survival strategy — rolling out new chips earlier than rivals — may be a good reference for other firms. MediaTek launched the industry’s first 8-core handset chips. Despite its bigger rival Qualcomm saying more cores in a CPU did not guarantee better performance, MediaTek’s new chips are a good selling point and have been well-received by its clients, most of which are in China. With its new 8-core chip, MediaTek is forecast to seize half of China’s handset chip market next year.
Chinese power management chipmaker Silergy Corp is another good example. Silergy, which is only five years old, is selling its chips at prices three times higher than its competitors, as it has invested heavily in R&D to help it integrate three chips into one for enhanced performance. Its R&D capabilities have helped it win orders from big-name global companies such as GE and Oscram.
Silergy said its ambition is to supply customers with the world’s best-quality products and that it aims to be the first choice of its customers. That is totally different from the mindset of most Taiwanese companies, whose goal is to supply less advanced products at lower prices than their larger global competitors.
Silergy’s efforts have paid off, as it posted a stunning 50 percent gross margin for last year, even higher than the 43.9 percent MediaTek posted for last quarter. Silgergy is set to launch an initial public offering in Taipei at the end of the year.
As competition stiffens, Taiwanese companies have to step up their R&D efforts. A single slip could send less competitive companies out of the market.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with