With the triple impact of weak exports, consumption and investment, the economic growth rate for the third quarter of this year was adjusted downward to 1.58 percent.
Real wages have been falling for so long that it comes as no surprise that consumption is weak. Exports and investment figures have been falling at the same time, which is worrying, all the more so since the government’s introduction of a series of policies aimed at stimulating exports and investment, and the resources it has invested to this end have been to no avail.
These policies have failed to achieve their expected results and state resources have not been used effectively.
It is quite right to seek fair competitive opportunities abroad for Taiwanese manufacturers. However, given that overseas demand is hard to predict and domestic demand is the mainstay of sustained economic growth, it may be more important to concentrate on the home front by thinking about how to boost consumption.
China, with its fast-growing economy, attaches great importance to stimulating domestic consumption and Minister of Finance Chang Sheng-ford (張盛和) said that the contribution to economic growth from domestic demand in the third quarter was about 60 percent.
Business in Taiwan is largely concentrated on manufacturing, the most important manufactured goods being electronic components, computers and other electronic products. None of these products are daily necessities and most manufacturers see cutting costs as the main way to make profits.
These factors mean that the nation can easily suffer if demand falls. Even when the economy improves, most factories are located abroad, which means that the upturn does not bring palpable benefits in the form of job opportunities and improved living standards for Taiwanese.
Since 2005, overseas profits have not had to be transferred back to Taiwan, but they are still included when the government calculates GDP. As a result, there has been a glaring discrepancy between the nation’s economic performance and the public’s quality of life.
Given that electronics manufacturing is so susceptible to fluctuations in other economies and considering the industry’s limited ability to provide employment in Taiwan, the government’s business policies should start paying attention to sectors that are more capable of absorbing labor, and less sensitive to economic ups and downs.
Farming, for example, must be locally based, since arable land cannot be packed up and taken away, and farm products are not so vulnerable to the impact of economic fluctuations. This means that agriculture can provide a relatively stable demand for labor, as well as value creation.
Some people may say that Taiwan’s land area is too small, but the Netherlands — which has 1.1 million hectares of arable land, just a quarter of what Japan has — is the world’s second-biggest exporter of agricultural products. Taiwan has about 865,000 hectares of arable land, but it has plenty of room for improvement in terms of yield value per unit area.
The point is not to encourage Taiwan to develop its agriculture, but to remind the government that economic policies should be decided based on sustainable growth. Only when there is a healthy cycle of supply and demand can there be sustained economic development.
If too much attention is focused on the overseas front, even if it produces some short-term gains, they may all come to nothing because the home front has been neglected.
Chen Chien-yin is a research assistant in the Department of Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with