‘Kind, righteous’ KMT
Speaking at the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) congress, former KMT chairman Wu Poh-hsiung (吳伯雄) said with tears that the “KMT is a kind, righteous party and not good at political wrangling.”
Wu hopefully cried because he said something that went against his conscience.
If the KMT were kind and righteous, Wu would not have first heard of the postponement of the party congress from China in August, the KMT would have returned its ill-gotten party assets to Taiwanese, as once suggested by Wu, and the KMT would not have held secret meetings (with Wu as one of the participants) with China to betray Taiwanese economically and politically. There would be nobody throwing shoes at President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) either.
If the KMT were kind and righteous, tens of thousands of Taiwanese would not have been massacred in the 228 Incident in 1947 and Taiwanese would not have to suffer 38 years of martial law and White Terror. The courts would not have been described as being operated by the KMT. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) would have been acquitted like Ma and many other indicted KMT officials.
If the KMT were not good at political wrangling, it would not have protested noisily and violently for months against its defeats in the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Ma would not have attempted to oust Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
Wu does not understand the Taiwanese saying “soft soil is dug deeply (軟土深掘).”
He should know that the KMT has never been like soft soil; it is and has always been a fierce party (鴨霸) with regard to Taiwanese. Wu must be blind to say the KMT is a “disadvantaged group (弱勢團體).” To Taiwanese, it is the richest political party in the world. However, the KMT is disadvantaged when it meets the Chinese Communist Party.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
Don’t panic over TOEIC
It may be true that Test of English for International Communication (TOIEC) scores are lagging, but this does not mean that Taiwan has an English crisis (“Taiwan’s TOIEC scores lagging,” Nov. 9, page 8). The “drop” from last year’s average score was only 3 points, not very much for a test with a maximum score of 990, and it was identical to the score in 2010 and is 6 points higher than the average score in 2008.
As the writer of the article, Shih Hsin University assistant professor of English Chang Sheng-en (張聖恩), points out, in at least one country that outscores Taiwan, those who take the test are already very proficient in English. In others, English is very widely used and is often an official language.
Although there is no crisis, we are interested in doing better. The best single way of improving TOEIC scores, as well as improving nearly all aspects of English-language proficiency, is to encourage pleasure reading in English; study after study has shown that when self-selected reading is included in English classes, there is dramatic improvement in reading, writing, vocabulary and grammar.
Many of the most important of these studies have been done in Taiwan, by Lee Sy-ying (李思穎), a professor at National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, and her associates Wang Fei-yu (王費瑜) and Hsieh Ming-yi (謝明義), and Kenneth Smith of the Wenzao Ursuline College of Language.
In addition, professor Beniko Mason of Shitennoji University Junior College in Japan has demonstrated, in a series of studies, that adult students can made substantial gains on the TOEIC simply by reading in English for pleasure, gains that are far superior to those achieved by those taking traditional classes.
Let’s invest in libraries with a good supply of genuinely interesting reading material in English, and include time for pleasure reading in English class. This is a modest investment, one that should be considered before we take more drastic and expensive measures.
Stephen Krashen
Los Angeles
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength