SID also hacking civilians
I watched with great interest the responses of the chiefs of British intelligence agencies MI5, MI6 and Government Communications Headquarters giving a democratic question-and-answer session with the British parliament’s Committee on Security.
British Member of Parliament Sir Menzies Campbell’s comment after the session that “more transparency needs to be given to the British public” is commendable.
Democracy is alive and well in Britain. However, these are the same spy organizations that gave us “intelligence” that former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Yet they are also the same organizations that have foiled numerous terrorist acts on British soil. They emphasized that a person will only be hacked if they are deemed a threat to national security.
US whistleblower Edward Snowden set them back years by revealing some of their tactics and modus operandi. The media in Britain cannot be bullied. They constantly push the democratic boundaries for the sake of human rights and freedom of expression, even though the News of the World newspaper seemed to use underhanded tactics — namely hacking — to get headlines.
Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Taiwan. I refer to Lin Feng-jeng’s (林峰正) recent article on spying in Taiwan (“Easy surveillance leads to abuse,” Nov. 5, page 8). Despite the local media being interested in the hacking of politician’s telephone lines, such as that of Legislative Speaker Jin-pyng (王金平), nothing has been done about it. Instead, all has gone quiet.
As evidenced by my case, innocent residents are also being targeted and nothing has been done about that either. A lot of evidence can be garnered from your laptop’s event log. My laptop’s memory reveals that it has been the subject of hacking from the Special Investigative Division (SID) of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office, the Criminal Investigation Bureau or the Ministry of Justice’s Investigation Bureau, complete with user IDs.
The XML data history makes for interesting reading. I am not a threat to Taiwan’s national security, but I am somehow a threat to the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government, which oversees the SID. My laptop and cellphone were hacked for many months. This can happen to anyone, as indicated by Lin and Snowden.
Despite the best efforts of Taiwan’s media, authoritarianism still exists in the nation. There is little democracy in Taiwan if the government gets away with hacking in situations when there is no national security threat. This is outlawed in Britain and most other countries around the world. However, in Taiwan, this is commonplace.
Releasing “classified” information is a threat to a nation’s security, which is why Snowden is a wanted man around the world. He signed a confidentiality clause when he started working for the US National Security Agency, but broke his contract. Therefore, he must face the consequences.
Human Rights activists like Campbell are correct in their statements, but as the British spy chiefs stated on Saturday, trying to find terrorist cells, pedophiles and fraudsters on the Internet is like looking for a needle in a haystack. So why must they waste their resources listening to innocent civilians?
Perhaps the SID should explain to the public why it has the right to listen to innocent politicians’ conversations and hack into innocent civilians’ laptops. This will never happen and until then, the KMT government will blindly lead Taiwan into unification with China.
Paul Gilford
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with