Several days ago, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), concerned that the cross-strait service trade agreement has yet to be passed in the legislature, said that the emergence of the Shanghai free-trade zone and other pilot zones in the area have already offset the advantages that the agreement would have provided in the Fujian area, and that the situation would be dire if the trade pact is not passed.
However, Ma’s statement leads to several questions. First, if a nascent Shanghai zone could really neutralize the benefits the service trade agreement is purported to bring to Taiwan, what happened to the claims by the Ma administration that the pact would shore up Taiwan’s service industry, or of the magical transformative effect it would have for Taiwanese businesses in China?
Second, the many items that would be deregulated for Taiwanese companies in China as part of the pact would be limited to Fujian Province: Is this the core reason that these supposed benefits would be canceled out so quickly by the Shanghai zone? If so, this means that it is all the more important that the terms of the pact are renegotiated, so that they are more equal and balanced. That is, China should agree to open up in its entirety to Taiwanese businesses, in all its provinces and cities, and not just one specific region.
Third, other cities in China, such as Tianjin and Xiamen, are already proactively applying for pilot free-trade zone status. In a few years’ time, when China has these free-trade zones dotted all over, what is Taiwan to do then? The government needs to explain this to the Taiwanese public.
All along, the Ma administration has been spouting all kinds of supposed threats to Taiwan in its efforts to persuade the public about the importance of the cross-strait service trade agreement.
With the rapid passage of the free-trade agreement between Taiwan and New Zealand late last month, and the imminent economic agreement with Singapore, the government seems to be reluctant to explore just why it is that the public is so expectant about the possibility of signing comprehensive free-trade agreements with other countries, and yet is so reticent about furthering trade ties with China.
The thing that is truly dire is that the government persists in pushing the passage of the cross-strait service trade pact in spite of this widely acknowledged and quite evident mainstream public opinion.
Huang Tzu-wei is a researcher at Taiwan Thinktank.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with