In response to reports that average real wages in the first half of the year had fallen to the same level as 16 years earlier, government officials said that if you factor in the decline in legal working hours and the increase in employers’ contribution to the new labor pension system, salaries have actually climbed by 16.5 percent. However, this interpretation is clearly at odds with the experience of households living on declining salaries and wages.
It also suggests that the government has yet to find a convincing solution to the nation’s woes.
First, according to the Council for Labor Affairs’ international labor figures for this year, although Taiwan’s official working hours dropped from 48 hours a week to 84 hours every two weeks, this decline was smaller compared with those of Japan and South Korea.
Moreover, although working hours in Taiwan continue to fall year on year, Taiwanese still work more hours compared with workers in Western countries.
In addition, non-farm payroll is far lower in Taiwan than in neighboring areas or countries: Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore and Japan.
This phenomenon of long working hours and low wages and salaries has bestowed on Taiwan the dubious honor of being one of the most favored countries for investment in terms of labor costs, as the low salaries are an added incentive for employers. For the same level of expenditure, companies can hire more people in Taiwan than they could in many other countries.
It is perhaps not a competitive edge the nation should be proud of.
Second, to say that the increase in employers’ contribution rate to the pension fund from 2 percent to 6 percent equates to a 4 percent rise in salaries is an oversimplification, to say the least. As a company’s costs rise, its profits fall, all other things being equal.
When productivity remains steady, a company may get into trouble if costs increase, forcing it to reduce costs in other areas, such as cutting salaries. However, if it does that, it will still need to negotiate with workers or risk falling foul unions. As a result, companies with steady productivity have to seek other measures, such as reducing the salary level offered to new employees.
This perhaps is the reason why the salaries of new employees are not as high as they used to be.
Studies carried out by economists show that the salaries of workers who began working following the implementation of the new labor pension system have fallen markedly, and the size of this decrease is equivalent to 5.86 percent of workers’ salaries.
Evidently, employers are passing on the additional costs incurred by the increased contribution rate to the workers themselves. In other words, to say that workers benefit with a 4 percent increase in their salaries simply does not add up when considering workers’ actual take-home pay.
Taiwan’s economy has performed poorly over the past few years. Nobody is disputing the fact that families depending on a salary are struggling.
The government ought to focus on the root causes of these problems, propose effective policies to address them and bear in mind that economic growth is a means to improving the lot of the public, and not an end in itself.
If economic growth does not improve the lot of ordinary people, they will not feel the benefit.
Chen Chien-yin is a research assistant in the Department of Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS