In response to reports that average real wages in the first half of the year had fallen to the same level as 16 years earlier, government officials said that if you factor in the decline in legal working hours and the increase in employers’ contribution to the new labor pension system, salaries have actually climbed by 16.5 percent. However, this interpretation is clearly at odds with the experience of households living on declining salaries and wages.
It also suggests that the government has yet to find a convincing solution to the nation’s woes.
First, according to the Council for Labor Affairs’ international labor figures for this year, although Taiwan’s official working hours dropped from 48 hours a week to 84 hours every two weeks, this decline was smaller compared with those of Japan and South Korea.
Moreover, although working hours in Taiwan continue to fall year on year, Taiwanese still work more hours compared with workers in Western countries.
In addition, non-farm payroll is far lower in Taiwan than in neighboring areas or countries: Hong Kong, South Korea, Singapore and Japan.
This phenomenon of long working hours and low wages and salaries has bestowed on Taiwan the dubious honor of being one of the most favored countries for investment in terms of labor costs, as the low salaries are an added incentive for employers. For the same level of expenditure, companies can hire more people in Taiwan than they could in many other countries.
It is perhaps not a competitive edge the nation should be proud of.
Second, to say that the increase in employers’ contribution rate to the pension fund from 2 percent to 6 percent equates to a 4 percent rise in salaries is an oversimplification, to say the least. As a company’s costs rise, its profits fall, all other things being equal.
When productivity remains steady, a company may get into trouble if costs increase, forcing it to reduce costs in other areas, such as cutting salaries. However, if it does that, it will still need to negotiate with workers or risk falling foul unions. As a result, companies with steady productivity have to seek other measures, such as reducing the salary level offered to new employees.
This perhaps is the reason why the salaries of new employees are not as high as they used to be.
Studies carried out by economists show that the salaries of workers who began working following the implementation of the new labor pension system have fallen markedly, and the size of this decrease is equivalent to 5.86 percent of workers’ salaries.
Evidently, employers are passing on the additional costs incurred by the increased contribution rate to the workers themselves. In other words, to say that workers benefit with a 4 percent increase in their salaries simply does not add up when considering workers’ actual take-home pay.
Taiwan’s economy has performed poorly over the past few years. Nobody is disputing the fact that families depending on a salary are struggling.
The government ought to focus on the root causes of these problems, propose effective policies to address them and bear in mind that economic growth is a means to improving the lot of the public, and not an end in itself.
If economic growth does not improve the lot of ordinary people, they will not feel the benefit.
Chen Chien-yin is a research assistant in the Department of Economics at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
RSS