Representative to the US King Pu-tsung (金溥聰), a close aide of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his most ardent defender, offered a rare apology on Thursday. A staff member wrote comments on a Sept. 12 report in the Washington Post about the political strife between Ma and Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) over the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) decision to revoke Wang’s party membership after allegations against Wang of improper lobbying.
The report, titled “Taiwan’s president, ruling party hit by scandal, rifts, anger over wiretapping,” discussed the political scandal and its consequences. Frank Wang (王億) director of the press division of the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the US said in comments on the Post’s Web site that he was “very glad the KMT came to resolutely discipline its heavyweight party member. Taiwan’s judiciary will be cleaner, and the legislative process will be smoother.”
He also referred to Wang Jin-pyng as “former legislative speaker” even though he has retained his role as speaker and his party membership after a Taipei District Court injunction.
King apologized in a statement for letting his subordinate issue personal opinions on the incident and failing to maintain the office’s neutrality. He promised to instruct officials not to post personal comments that do not represent the office’s official position.
Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), who obtained a copy of the letter to the editor penned by Frank Wang, accused King of lying when he said that he did not notice that the online messages were different from the letter, which indicated that the controversial comment had been added by King or another official.
It is unimportant who is responsible for the controversial comments, but judging from the office’s response, it is necessary for King, as the representative to the US, to offer a formal apology over his negligence.
However, as Ma’s confidant, known for his sharp attacks on Ma’s political rivals and critics, King is in no position to apologize for his subordinate’s defense of the president. He has violated the principle of neutrality and abused his authority too many times in defending Ma.
When King served as the information and news director during Ma’s Taipei mayoral term, many press officials and media executives were pressed not to carry negative coverage of the mayor. Interference in the media worsened over the years as Ma rose to become president and KMT chairman.
The latest example is political pundit Nan Fang Shuo’s (南方朔) accusations that the Ma administration persuaded the Chinese-language newspaper the China Times to reject his column on Sept. 17. He said this was done because it was critical of the president’s move against the speaker and described King, Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺), then-deputy secretary-general Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) and Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) as the “gang of four” involved in a “premeditated plan” against Wang Jin-pyng.
King fired back at the accusations and said he has filed a lawsuit against the pundit to defend his reputation and to stem abuse of freedom of speech.
It is outrageous, yet predictable, that King is still waging war on media coverage against Ma even though he is now the nation’s representative to the US. His priorities should be strengthening Taiwan-US relations, rather than paying attention to how local media have interpreted the wiretapping and lobbying incident.
Before offering an apology over his staff member’s behavior, King should engage in self-reflection and ponder his own violations of the principle of neutrality.
French firm DCI-DESCO in April won a bid to upgrade Taiwan’s Lafayette frigates, which has strained ties between China and France. In 1991, France sold Taiwan six Lafayette frigates and in 1992 sold it 60 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. To prevent arms sales between the nations, China negotiated an agreement with France and in 1994 in a joint statement, France promised that there would be no future arms sales to Taiwan. From China’s point of view, the DCI-DESCO deal constitutes a breach of the agreement, but the French stance is that it is not selling Taiwan new weapons, but instead providing a
Chung Yuan ChristiaN University is clearly in bed with the People’s Republic of China. This can be the only explanation why the school’s authorities have done their utmost to shield a student, who lodged a complaint against an associate professor, and then used thuggish tactics to compel the teacher to issue two separate apologies to China. The original complaint, filed by an unnamed Chinese student, was for remarks by associate professor Chao Ming-wei (招名威) during a class on the origin of COVID-19. A second complaint was filed by the same student after Chao, during an apology, stated that he was a
President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in her inaugural address on May 20 firmly said: “We will not accept the Beijing authorities’ use of ‘one country, two systems’ to downgrade Taiwan and undermine the cross-strait status quo.” The Chinese government was not too happy, and later that day, an opinion piece on the Web site of China’s state broadcaster China Central Television said: “While Tsai’s first inaugural address four years ago was read by Beijing as an ‘unfinished answer sheet,’ the one she presented this time was even more below-par.” Speaking to the China Review News Agency, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies vice president
During my twenty-two years in the US Senate, I became a student of Taiwan and its history. I was chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on East Asia, the Pacific and International Cybersecurity Policy, and have made at least 25 trips to Taiwan and have been invited as an observer to two of the nation’s presidential elections. Taiwan’s continuous economic miracle has seen the nation transition from a mixed agricultural-industrial society at the end of Japan’s 50 years of jurisdiction to today’s economic powerhouse, unmatched by most nations of the world. Just as outstanding has been Taiwan’s decades of resistance and