The pressure placed by floods and droughts will increase. Careful planning is needed, while engineering should be only the final stage in the process.
The view that humans can conquer nature has long prevailed and is an extremely dangerous concept. Both structural and non-structural approaches to diminishing the impact of natural disasters should be considered, but we place too high an expectation on structural approaches, such as continuing to raise embankments and dredging rivers.
The sudden drastic increase in rain in recent years means that building embankments will not be an effective way to prevent flooding. The most effective approach to flood prevention is to find ways to coexist with water and natural disasters by relying on non-engineering flood prevention strategies that work together with the local geography, environment and urban characteristics to return water to the rivers.
Rainstorm management can be effectively integrated with urban water resource management by taking a three-dimensional approach to water conservation. It is not about removing the water, but keeping it in appropriate places, at the same time as considering damage control, pollution prevention, erosion, climate change adaptation and economic efficiency.
Urban water management should start with a focus on paths and total volumes, and it should include accumulation and seep-through mechanisms.
“Accumulation” means providing the possibility of temporarily keeping water at a suitable location, such as a square, a park, a school playground, the atrium of a big building, or other similar locations. Spaces of various sizes can be used for this function, with each location functioning as a storage pool that will diminish surface runoff and peak flood concentrations. These pools can also accumulate rainwater for recycling.
“Seep-through” means allowing water to flow vertically instead of horizontally and letting water purify through the seep-through process, while also replenishing the groundwater. This would also help prevent water from collecting rapidly in one particular place.
Rainstorm management should include countermeasures for spaces of different scale, with plans for the national, regional and urban level. Much research has built up about Taiwan’s environmentally sensitive areas, and this research could be used to create overlay maps to define areas where development should be banned, restricted or allowed.
It should also be possible to take advantage of national land planning to properly prepare different locations to aid in water management. For example in terms of urban planning, consideration should be given to the potential risk for floods when developing new areas, and controls should be applied on land use and urban design based on the special characteristics of rainstorms. In addition, landscape design and water conservation could be integrated by directing urban flood water and purifying surface runoff.
However, rainfall in Taiwan can be very heavy, and any individual facility will have only a limited effect. Only by joining all facilities into a networked system that can deal with the accumulation and use of water in a larger area, will it be possible to turn often damaging water into a resource.
At the individual locations, existing open spaces, unused land and open spaces in direct connection to buildings should be redesigned into key locations for regulating, stopping and accumulating flood water, and each location should also collect local rainwater. In new land developments, overall consideration should be given to the use of and recycling of water resources by minimizing excavation in order to maximize seep-through area in combination with a system for collecting rainwater for recycling.
As the frequency of natural disasters increases and their impact becomes increasingly severe, it seems that major disasters are becoming a part of life, and water plays an important role.
As a result of the increasingly large expropriations and redesign of land in recent years, large areas of agricultural and forest land have been turned into construction sites, which means that land use is going through planned transformation on a large scale.
If we continue to rely on traditional methods, the risk will remain unchanged. We must change our attitude toward natural disasters, and if we want to address the cause of the problem, attitudes and policies need to change because water will always find ways to get through.
Using appropriate space planning and design is the way to go if we are to be able to coexist with water. Whether or not that will be possible will of course depend on the government’s vision and resolve.
Wang Jieh-jiuh is an associate professor of architecture at Ming Chuan University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030