Taiwan has recently been hit by rabies, but due to a lack of funding, the government has not been able to purchase an adequate amount of vaccine. Cuts to HIV/AIDS medication funding have been suggested as one solution to the lack of money available for rabies vaccines because the proportion of funds for national disease prevention that go toward HIV/AIDS medication is so high.
With an increase in the number of people with HIV and yearly increases in HIV/AIDS-related expenses, the government’s funding strategy has been to continue negotiations to lower the costs of drugs and limit the number of drug combinations available for people with the disease.
For drug companies, lowering costs means a drop in profits which could have repercussions on investment in development and quality control. This could slow down the development of new drugs, while also lowering the chances of those drugs coming into Taiwan.
For people with HIV, restricting drug alternatives means that their options are limited if the initial drug combination is not effective, which is wasteful. Bad experiences with certain drug combinations for patients could make them afraid to receive additional medical treatment.
And reducing HIV/AIDS treatment costs by negotiating prices downward is obviously not an effective means to lower the number of new infections.
Due to the design of Taiwan’s medical system and because HIV is a communicable disease, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has been responsible for management of the disease for a long time. However, given that the vast majority of people with the disease now survive for a long time and because the number of newly infected people continues to rise, the government should rethink which of its departments are responsible for HIV/AIDS-related costs.
The government should also get the National Health Insurance Administration and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to work together and help make sure that people living with HIV/AIDS receive good treatment at the various stages of their illness. It should also allow people whose conditions are stable to re-enter the National Health Insurance system. This would stop HIV-positive people from being kicked around different parts of the medical care system.
HIV infections are increasing among young people, many of whom are students. However, the majority of parents think that: “My child will never catch a disease like that.”
This leads parents to look upon sex education as unnecessary. Therefore, HIV prevention policies should not only be focused on sex education among the young, but also on educating parents, enabling them to face up to the severe trend of HIV infections. Only by doing this can HIV prevention be effective.
The increasing number of HIV infections among young Taiwanese will have repercussions on the labor force. Ensuring that HIV-positive people can continue to receive steady drug treatments should be a major, long-term goal of the health agencies’ policy. In addition, well-thought-out policies rely on listening to the concerns of everyone involved.
The newly established Ministry of Health and Welfare has promised to create a healthy Taiwan. This promise must not remain a slogan. The ministry must come up with national policies that benefit people living with HIV/AIDS. Such an approach is necessary to remove the scapegoat of drug costs whenever public budget allocations are inadequate.
Ivory Lin is secretary-general of the Persons with HIV/AIDS Rights Advocacy Association of Taiwan.
Translated by Drew Cameron
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) is expected to be summoned by the Taipei City Police Department after a rally in Taipei on Saturday last week resulted in injuries to eight police officers. The Ministry of the Interior on Sunday said that police had collected evidence of obstruction of public officials and coercion by an estimated 1,000 “disorderly” demonstrators. The rally — led by Huang to mark one year since a raid by Taipei prosecutors on then-TPP chairman and former Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — might have contravened the Assembly and Parade Act (集會遊行法), as the organizers had