Globalization is like the weather: we may not always like its effects, but it is not going away, and like the weather, the consequences of globalization are unpredictable. Take the example of international tourism, specifically the millions of Chinese tourists now pouring into Taiwan.
The latest figures from the Taiwan Strait Tourism Association show that 1.19 million Chinese visited Taiwan in the first five months of this year, up by 12 percent compared with the same period last year. In the past five years 6.2 million Chinese have visited Taiwan and they are spending a lot of money in the process. For example, it is estimated the production of pineapple cake, apparently relished by Chinese tourists, has increased 17 times since 2009, generating a revenue of NT$26 billion (US$868.6 million)
However, it is not just the sale of pineapple cake that is affected by Chinese tourists visiting Taiwan — it is these Chinese citizens’ very sense of identity.
Identity is more than who we think we are, it is political. For example, as a Briton living in Asia and visiting Taiwan regularly, the idea that Taiwan is not a country in its own right is, to me, just unthinkable. Ask any Westerner, living in Taiwan or not, and they will recognize the discursive sovereignty of Taiwan. Put it this way, Taiwan is Taiwan, China is China; foreign countries to outsiders and, moreover, to each other.
Identity is also porous: it is affected by experience — we are each a product of our history. So, what must be the impact on all these millions of Chinese tourists as they pour into Taipei and experience Taiwanese culture for the first time? One can only speculate, but for sure, impact there will be.
There are now more than 6 million Chinese who have visited Taiwan in the past five years alone, and this year there will be several million more. They have tasted not just the pineapple cake, but the very essence of life in what is, essentially, a foreign country. Very different to back home.
This is the unpredictability at the heart of globalization: To travel is to be exposed to difference not only in terms of language, culture and food, but in terms of identity itself.
There has been much speculation in Taiwan about the cultural and especially economic impact of China on Taiwan now and in the future. My viewpoint is rather different — I believe the actual power impact goes the other way. In reality, it is Taiwan which is more likely to change China, not vice versa. We can see the same “soft power” process happening between Hong Kong and China, and in favor of Hong Kong.
What happens is that tourists from China visit Taiwan and immediately become aware that there is more than one way to be “Chinese.” They will see and experience the unique vibrancy of Taipei, enjoy its relaxed and friendly cosmopolitanism, be exposed to the Taiwanese way of life, sense the country’s essence, yet feel comforted by the familiar — the pineapple cake.
Once exposed to the assumed values and freedoms inherent in Taiwanese daily living, the average Chinese tourist will not easily be able to forget it; they will be looking for more of the same back home. This is how the soft power of identity operates: We are changed by our experiences, by our exposure to difference, but invariably we gravitate, consciously and subconsciously, toward freedom, choice and opportunity.
In the age of high-tech globalization, individual governments can erect as many political boundaries as they like, but the reality is we are living in a dramatically changing world, one which is increasingly fluid and porous — just like ourselves.
Stephen Whitehead is a visiting professor of gender studies at Shih Hsin University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with