Last week, I was in Tokyo for an event marking the fifth anniversary of the Japan Uighur Association. While there, I met with World Uyghur Congress president Rebiya Kadeer, who was visiting Japan, and talked with her about visiting Taiwan.
Kadeer gave several talks while in Japan. During an international press conference in Tokyo, the topic that members of the foreign press were most concerned about was whether the handing over of power to China’s new leaders, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Chinese Premier Li Keqiang (李克強), would provide any possibility for reform, as well as the current conditions of the Uighur people.
Kadeer said Uighur religion and culture still suffered major restrictions and that Uighurs continue to be killed and sentenced.
It is for comments like these that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have labeled her a “Xinjiang separatist.”
Therefore, although she is willing to enter into talks with the CCP to bring about reconciliation and consolidation, it still seems that this will be very hard to achieve.
Some of my like-minded friends recently established the Taiwan Friends of Uighurs, which, apart from concerning itself with the human rights situation of Uighurs, hopes that the CCP will carry out concrete reforms.
They also hope to remind the Taiwanese that if their nation fails to retain its sovereignty, it will end up in a similar situation to Xinjiang and any protest movement by the Taiwanese will be viewed as “terrorism.”
Chinese activist Chen Guangcheng (陳光誠) arrived in Taipei from New York last Sunday. Chen has had a remarkable life.
It is intriguing how he managed to escape from his home in Shandong, even when it was under full guard by CCP security officers, especially as the CCP was spending as much as 60 million yuan (US$9.77 million) a year on Chen in the way of “stability maintenance fees” and as much as 700 billion yuan a year on security across China.
On Tuesday, Chen delivered a speech in the legislature about how human rights should be the basis of cross-strait peace. Chen’s speech showed clearly that he has a much better understanding of what peace is than President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Ma has surrendered to China in exchange for peace, which will result in the CCP’s violent rule of Taiwan.
It is fitting to remember the peace treaty that Tibet signed with China back in 1951, which China ignored just a few years later.
The handover of Hong Kong’s sovereignty from the UK to China in 1997 was part of another international agreement between China and, this time, the UK, which was submitted to the UN.
Now, China’s People’s Liberation Army guns can be seen pointed at Hong Kong’s affluent Central District, threatening Hong Kongers. It is no wonder that Chen said it is preferable to have legislators pushing each other around in the legislature than a repeat of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre.
Just as Chen was delivering one of his speeches, opposition legislators were engaged in a shoving match with KMT legislators. Opposition party lawmakers were trying to stop the Ma government from making an arbitrary decision on the cross-strait service trade agreement and letting it automatically come into effect without consulting the public.
These legislators demanded that the agreement be reviewed and voted on clause by clause.
The service trade agreement will leave Taiwan wide open to China and have an impact on millions of Taiwanese.
However, the Ma administration has used back-room deals to sign the agreement with China. It has also used “cold violence” to strip the Taiwanese of their most basic rights.
Given this, it is not at all wrong for the public and legislators to use extreme methods to protest this situation.
Taiwanese cannot be like the Chinese, who have become slaves under thousands of years of traditional Confucian education.
We need to use the blood that pumps in our veins to get rid of this slave mentality, if we are serious about protecting the universal value of human rights.
If peaceful and rational protest does not work, and when sovereignty and human rights are in danger, because those in power use sinister means and violent suppression, all men and women should unite in stronger protest.
Further, if a person is not angered by unfair speech and events, and acts as if they never happened, I would say that that person does not have any human feelings whatsoever.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past