Taiwan has experienced several natural disasters and health emergencies in recent years, such as the 921 Earthquake in 1999, the SARS outbreak in 2003 and Typhoon Morakot in 2009. These calamities have provided us with a lot of experience on the mental health aspect of emergency response work. Nevertheless, an online epidemic prevention booklet from by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published in response to the H7N9 avian influenza outbreak does not mention public mental health.
The handbook is intended for a mass readership. It talks about keeping the media informed and getting the message out, and it reminds the public to avoid contact with birds and to take personal protection measures. However, the suggestions focus exclusively on “physical” measures, such as frequently washing one’s hands; covering one’s mouth with a handkerchief, surgical mask or sleeve when sneezing; and seeking prompt medical attention when one feels ill. It advises people who may have the flu to stay home and to contact health authorities and it urges those caring for flu patients to be aware of their own health.
One glaring omission is the question of how people should deal with the worry or fear that arises when an epidemic is evolving. The booklet pays no attention to public reaction to the government’s reports about the H7N9 situation. The psychological trauma that resulted from patients being isolated or ostracized during the SARS outbreak could well be repeated, so it would be wise to learn from the past and think about how to deal with the many mental health issues that arise during a viral epidemic. The booklet could be improved by addressing some important mental health concerns. For example, how are people placed in isolation going to cope with it? And how should their family members go about caring for them?
During the SARS crisis, we established the Mental Health Action Alliance, which proposed some ideas for coping with the fear of infection and the loneliness of isolation. We learned the importance of social support and communities. Support channels for care are crucial. These include families and neighbors, teachers and students, and nearby clinics and welfare departments. In the wake of the SARS outbreak, an evidence-based program of “laughing qigong” not only improved participants’ immunity but, more importantly, increased social support and lessened individual fears and anxieties. The alliance also published literature on coping with SARS-related stress that is available for download and is equally applicable to the H7N9 flu.
The question is, given that the government set up psychological support systems years ago, why has it not reminded people about what is available? When this was pointed out, the government’s response was that there was no need to panic because there had been no cases of H7N9 in Taiwan. Only now that one case has been confirmed has the government begun its support systems. Why did it have to wait until there was a case and people started to panic? The main reason is that there is no high-level and independent government department dedicated to running such a system. The H7N9 situation highlights the dire need for a separate mental health department under the Department of Health.
In the face of widespread fear about H7N9, everyone should keep an eye on the government to ensure it sets up a comprehensive psychological support network. While we need to boost people’s physical immunity, we also need to strengthen their psychological stress management and safeguard their mental health.
Chang Chueh is an associate professor at National Taiwan University’s Institute of Health Policy and Management and convener of the Mental Health Action Alliance.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with