“You have taken everything from me,” said Inocencia Lucha, a 47-year-old Spanish woman who recently walked into her bank in Almassora, Valencia, poured gasoline over her body and set herself on fire.
She was indebted to the bank, living on 360 euros (US$470) a month, and had just received an eviction notice. Behind Spain’s new unemployment figures, with 27 percent of the population now out of work, lie many such stories of desperation: in the last three months there have been 14 suicides where economic hardship was a factor reported in the media.
It is nearly two years since the indignados (“the outraged”) took over public squares around the country to protest against the economy being run for the benefits of the banks and not the people.
Illustration: Mountain People
Now, from the Mortgage Victims’ Platform to the Citizens’ Tide — a coalition of 350 organizations, from health workers to trade unions and youth groups, that have mobilized hundreds of thousands against privatization and austerity — more people are making the journey from private sadness to public indignation.
There is a dawning realization that recovery is not, as the politicians promised, just around the corner. All signs point to a “lost decade.”
Figures published last week show a large increase in the number of those out of work for more than two years, indicating a newly growing underclass. The unemployment rate is a staggering 40 percent for some regions in Andalucia and 57 percent for young people; one in five people live below the poverty line.
The Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza said that sadness arises from a disconnection from our potencia — our power to act.
It is no coincidence, then, that the powerful use the language of shame to keep us impotent: unemployment and debt are the fault of the individual alone, they say, and social sadness a private affair.
This is no doubt why Maria Dolores de Cospedal, general secretary of the ruling Partido Popular, recently boasted that its supporters “would go hungry” rather than fail to pay their mortgage. (This, it must be pointed out, is one way to weaken your voter base.)
Cospedal was targeting the Mortgage Victims’ Platform, which is transforming the isolating stigma of eviction into a groundswell of popular outrage that is fueling practical action. Widespread mis-selling of mortgages contributed to the huge foreclosure crisis — running at 500 eviction orders a day — that is leaving families destitute and homeless.
In just a few years the Mortgage Victims’ Platform has defended hundreds of homes from eviction and forced banks to renegotiate. Ada Colau, its spokesperson, is now a household name after calling the representative of the Spanish Banking Association “a criminal” during a hearing in Spain’s congress.
“He is not an expert,” she said. “The representatives of the banks are the cause of the problem.”
The Mortgage Victims’ Platform trudged pavements for more than a year to gather 1.4 million signatures, forcing the government to debate its proposal to change the draconian mortgage law where you can lose your house and still carry mortgage debt with you for life. Its other demands include a halt to evictions and social rent. This week the Partido Popular gutted the legislative proposal, despite a recent ruling by the European Court of Justice that found Spanish mortgage laws contravened EU directives. Huge popular support for the Mortgage Victims’ Platform demands have put Partido Popular politicians on the offensive: Politicians have described the group as “Nazis” and “terrorist sympathizers” because activists were doorstepping them in their homes to pressure them to pass the new law.
However, it is the Spanish political class that is close to being discredited. Corruption scandals have implicated many key members and former colleagues of the government, including the prime minister, in taking undeclared money from the construction and property development industries responsible for the housing bubble.
Spanish Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has become known as Mariano Plasma after giving press conferences via a TV screen so the media could not ask questions. During sombre economic announcements on Friday last week he made no appearance at all.
Given the lack of accountability in the political process, social movements are finding other, creative ways to give voice to those suffering from the crisis, including the young people who have been forced to look for work abroad. According to El Pais, 260,000 people aged between 16 years old and 30 years old left Spain last year. An indignado group, Youth Without Future, is collecting portraits of these young Spaniards, holding up signs detailing their stories of unemployment, exile and insecurity under the slogan: “We didn’t leave; they threw us out.”
Meanwhile, Madrilonia, an indignado blog, declares the entire economic model broken. The authors are not waiting around for someone to fix it, but building their own alternatives, from the Catalan network of cooperatives to the Casa Precaria in Madrid that advises people on how to go about creating their own jobs through worker cooperatives.
Couple social deprivation with a democratic process that most people feel alienated from and you have a recipe for social unrest. The only question is whether protest will successfully create meaningful forms of political participation and democratic control over economic decisionmaking. For example, the Citizen’s Tide coalition is pushing for an audit of Spain’s national debt under the slogan “we don’t owe, we won’t pay,” and a referendum that will allow the population to register its opinion on austerity measures and privatization.
On June 1 it is to join other social movements across southern Europe in street mobilizations against austerity. Meanwhile, Mortgage Victims’ Platform members are increasingly turning to civil disobedience. The number of repossessed, bank-owned blocks of flats occupied by evicted families is growing.
Two years ago the indignados occupied the plazas across Spain to protest against the crisis and demand a “real democracy.”
Now, it seems, indignation is becoming a generalized condition.
Katharine Ainger is co-editor of We Are Everywhere: The irresistible rise of global anti-capitalism.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with