A recent survey showed more than half of first-time jobseekers were interested in opportunities in the nation’s service sector. Foundry giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co was at seventh — the only technology company to make the top 10 of the most desirable companies for starting a career.
The survey conducted by the Chinese-language Cheers magazine showed listed restaurant chain operator Wowprime Corp as the most desirable company to work for, while electronics giant Hon Hai Precision Industry Co and PC brand Acer Inc both dropped out of the top 10, to 13th and 30th respectively.
The survey can be seen as an indication of the nation’s industrial trends and economic development, as it highlights the economy’s gradual transformation from being dominated by manufacturing to being service-oriented.
However, it is not yet known whether the service sector can be as competitive as the technology and manufacturing sectors. It is also unclear what role the service sector would play in boosting the nation’s growth.
Such concerns come to mind when one hears of recent media reports of a doctoral student at National Chengchi University’s Department of Risk Management and Insurance who has become a street vendor of fried chicken in Taichung, or an assistant professor at De Lin Institute of Technology, who has spent more than two decades studying long-horned beetles, who now sells braised pork rice in Taitung.
Some may wonder why these two people with higher-education backgrounds would choose to pursue totally different careers. How would working in the service sector enhance their levels of job satisfaction? And practically, how much could they earn from their new jobs?
If the pair expect better prospects in the service sector, why now? Are their decisions part of long-term career plans, or merely short-term thinking?
None of us are in a position to comment on the validity of their decisions, as an individual’s decisions are their own business. As an old Chinese saying goes: There are masters in all walks of life.
However, if a pattern of similar decisions is seen in the future, then it may make a difference to the economy, and this would draw public attention to the nation’s educational policy, job prospects for graduates and the long-term blueprint for the development of the nation’s service sector.
As suggested by the survey results, at a time when the technology and manufacturing sectors are losing popularity among young jobseekers, despite these sectors’ relatively high salaries and potential for stock options, the service sector is becoming the main source of economic growth and job creation in Taiwan.
According to government statistics, by the end of last year, the service sector contributed about 70 percent of the nation’s GDP and service-sector workers comprised nearly 60 percent of the total employed.
However, is that enough to build the economy on, given the sector’s relatively low wages, smaller investment in research and development, and the smaller scale of the companies in the sector?
These concerns make one realize that the nation’s service sector is still dominated by traditional firms, such as restaurants and retail stores, while modern services — such as Internet, design, financial and legal companies — still have a long way to go to reach the levels seen in more advanced economies.
With that in mind, one has to ask if Taiwan is ready to further open up its service sector.
Does the government realize there is an urgent need to facilitate the free flow of human capital and foreign know-how, which are necessary to enhance competitiveness, and which have helped grow the technology and manufacturing sectors?
Too many questions need to be answered before we can confidently say that the nation has found new economic lifeblood in the service sector.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with