Talks over the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA) between Taiwan and the US that were delayed for five years recently started up again.
The agreement is essentially a mechanism for negotiating trade issues between the US and nations it could possibly enter into free trade agreements (FTA) with.
Taiwan and the US began the trade talks in 1994. At the time, the US was Taiwan’s most important export market. Because Taiwan had not yet joined the WTO, it lacked a communication platform with the US, and the TIFA was very helpful in solving trade issues between the two countries, minimizing trade friction and furthering bilateral trade.
The resumption of TIFA talks is very encouraging for Taiwan.
However, the real challenge has only just started. After a hiatus of five years, it is easy to imagine that the US and Taiwan will have many trade issues to discuss and it is impossible that this most recent round of talks will solve them all in one go. Lessons learned need to be remembered for the TIFA talks to progress smoothly.
Taiwan is an important market for US agricultural products, and during past TIFA meetings the US always viewed agriculture as a priority.
This time has been no exception, with the most important issue being pork. The import of US beef and pork both hinge on to whether Taiwan has adopted food safety laws in line with international standards and whether the government can effectively explain the reliability of those standards to the public.
Looking back at the previous issue of US beef imports, Taiwan still has a lot of room for improvement. In particular, given that pork imports will have a much larger effect on Taiwan’s domestic agricultural industry than the importation of US beef, the government needs to be careful and strive for completeness when it comes to future negotiation strategies, related policies and other measures. Taiwan should rationally face these issues and avoid politicizing them.
Apart from agriculture, the government should strive to handle other issues the US is concerned about, such as investment, taxes, intellectual property rights, government procurement and market liberalization, in an appropriate manner.
Taiwan should also leverage the TIFA to gain entry into the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) which is directed by the US. In recent years, increasing regional economic integration has begun to threaten Taiwan. There are 11 countries currently involved in the TPP and Japan may also soon join. If this happens, about a third of Taiwan’s exports will be tied up with TPP members and the nation would be deeply affected if it is unable to join the TPP soon.
Gaining entry into the TPP would be beneficial for Taiwan because it would help increase its exports, but the TPP operates to high standards of free trade, so Taiwan must also prepare itself to open up its markets. The primary condition in doing this is to make the US and other TPP members believe that Taiwan is determined to open its markets, promote trade liberalization and carry out reform. This is the only way to assure Taiwan’s entry to the TPP.
If the nation remains indecisive when it comes to liberalization and hesitant when dealing with systems reform, instead adopting a conservative wait-and-see approach, there will be no way for Taiwan to gain the US’ support in the future for entry into the TPP. All attempts to use the TIFA as platform for TPP membership will then have been in vain.
Liu Da-nien is head of the Regional Development Study Center of the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with