On International Human Rights Day, Dec. 10 last year, the legislature’s Judiciary and Organic Laws and Statutes Committee invited the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice to deliver reports on human rights and how to avoid miscarriages of justice.
The North America Taiwanese Professors’ Association (NATPA) affirms the request by the committee’s convener, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Yu Mei-nu (尤美女), for these reports and to speak up on behalf of those who have been wronged.
We also thank DPP legislators Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋), Mark Chen (陳唐山) and Hsu Tain-tsair (許添財) for speaking up for former Sino Swearingen Aircraft Corp (SSAC) chairman and chief executive Kuo Ching-chiang (郭清江), a member of NATPA allegedly involved in embezzlement and corruption at SSAC.
The three legislators said that the Special Investigation Division (SID), after conducting the SSAC investigation in 2008, did not further investigate the case.
Usually investigations must be finalized within eight months, but this case has been ongoing for almost five years without finding any wrongdoing by Kuo. The SID will not close the investigation and Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫) and Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) will not deal with it. This has caused suspicion that it is being handled on a political basis.
Kuo is not a public official, but he is under investigation for malfeasance. He was also barred from leaving the country for 10 months without legal grounds.His human rights have been seriously violated.
While barred from leaving the country, he requested that the SID initiate court proceedings to clarify the situation, but his request was rejected.
When Kuo was interviewed by the SID for the second time in January 2009, prosecutors told him that the US’ investigation into the SSAC case had been completed, that no irregularities had been found and that the investigation would not continue, so he was no longer barred from leaving the country.
However, he was informed that the SID was investigating former Council for Economic Planning and Development chairperson Ho Mei-yueh (何美玥) for influence peddling, and that he was suspected of “passively assisting Ho” and might have to return to Taiwan for questioning. He had to post NT$1 million (US$34,000) bail.
Kuo has still not been summoned for questioning. He has requested that the case be closed on five occasions, but the SID has ignored him and his bail payment has not been returned.
Kuo gave up a well-paid job in the US to return to Taiwan and has made numerous contributions here. For example, he helped resolve several problems in Taipei’s Mass Rapid Transit system.
He assisted in reconstruction following the 921 Earthquake in 1999 and developed ecological engineering techniques to prevent landslides and restore residential security.
Furthermore, he took charge of SSAC, where he obtained every certification required by the US’ Federal Aviation Administration, set up a production line to manufacture high-quality commercial aircraft and attract investment from a Saudi Arabian company, raising SSAC’s value to over US$100 million.
Despite these achievements, the abuse of judicial power and slander by the media have destroyed his reputation. He has been in limbo, suffering due to deliberate procrastination of prosecutors and an unwillingness to close the investigation although they are unable to find any evidence of wrongdoing.
NATPA calls on the Ministry of Justice to urge the prosecutor-general to urgently address this case and, if no wrongdoing can be established, promptly close the investigation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations