In his never-ending quest for power, and in an attempt to stay on as chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) for yet another term, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) drew criticism for citing the case of former US president Harry Truman to strengthen his argument.
Ma could have cited the example of former dictator Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who, after losing the Chinese Civil War, fled to Taiwan, where he came up with big ideas like “retaking the mainland” and “reforming” the KMT.
Instead, what he ended up doing was staying on as “lifelong head” of the KMT, ignoring the Constitution and coming up with ways to benefit himself and his cronies.
Despite the cries of many people like late intellectual Hu Shih (胡適), late Taiwan democracy pioneer Lei Chen (雷震) and late Taiwanese philosopher Yin Hai-kuang (殷海光), Chiang just kept on doing what he was doing, saying he was “doing everything he could to serve his country.”
However, Ma did not have the wits to cite this brilliant and ingenious leader, and instead invoked the 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution and Truman, who was so intensely disliked by Chiang.
The 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution sets a two-term limit for each president and a one-term limit if an individual becomes acting president less than two years into a term in which someone else was elected president.
This amendment was added to the US constitution after a proposal by the Republican Party because the Democratic former president Franklin Roosevelt broke an unwritten convention and was elected president four times before and during World War II.
The 22nd Amendment does not refer to re-election but, instead refers to the number of times a person can be elected president and the maximum number of years someone can serve as president.
Since this is also applicable to situations in which a candidate is not running for re-election, Ma could just forget about his re-election if he wants to cite this amendment.
This is why former US president Bill Clinton could not run for another term as president four years after he finished his two terms in office.
Ma is obsessed with power and his comparison to Truman invites ridicule because the difference between the two is enormous: The 22nd Amendment clearly states it was not applicable to the president in office at the time it was created, but Truman did not take advantage of this situation by holding on to power and running for a third term. Instead he chose to retire.
If one wishes to quote the US constitution to one’s advantage, it would be better to first gain an proper understanding of the US system.
The US constitution restricts presidential elections, and also the US does not have the same problem as Taiwan, having a president who also serves as the head of the ruling party.
Despite this, Ma tried to pull the wool over people’s eyes with talk about US democratic ideals.
To put it bluntly, the KMT is divided into two tiers only: orthodox leaders and sideline lackeys.
There is no need for Ma to go citing US precedent to support his bid for a third term as party chairman.
All he should do is to emulate Chiang, and get his lackeys to kowtow to him and ignore the KMT’s party constitution.
By doing that, Ma can continue to do everything he can to serve his country; just as Chiang claimed.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with