Taiwanese banks will be able to accept Chinese yuan deposits and offer yuan loans in Taiwan from next month. This is very different from when the banks were given permission to offer the same services for the US dollar and the yen. Leaving aside things like culture, language, history and education that make Taiwan and China very similar, interest rates and interest spreads are two very important factors when it comes to this issue.
Both the US and Japan are more developed than Taiwan, but their interest rates are lower than those on the New Taiwan (NT) dollar. There is thus no real incentive for Taiwanese to convert NT dollars into US dollars for savings accounts.
The same cannot be said of the yuan. Although Taiwan is more developed than China, the Chinese market is much larger than Taiwan’s. The factor price equalization that has occurred as a result of cross-strait industrial integration over the past 12 years will spread into Taiwan’s financial sector once yuan services are offered here. The factor price equalization across the Taiwan Strait is a kind of center-periphery process that presses down domestic salaries and pushes up unemployment.
The current loan interest rate in China is somewhere between 5 percent and 6 percent. If banks in Taiwan set deposit rates on the yuan to between 2 percent and 3 percent, the huge differences in the interest spread for loan and deposit services for the yuan compared to other currencies will mean that banks will place a higher priority on loan and deposit services for the yuan.
Even if the government limits the amount of NT dollars that can be exchanged each day, banks will work hard to promote yuan services, which are likely to completely overtake US dollars services and those of other currencies. Small and medium enterprises will be affected the most because the willingness of banks to lend money to such enterprises will drop and credit requirements are certain to become stricter.
Why would small and medium enterprises want to borrow yuan? The Chinese currency is still not an international currency and it is used within China for things like financing Chinese subsidiaries, new investments or real-estate purchases. While it will not move money directly out of Taiwan over to China, in reality, the process involved is no different from Taiwanese investments in China, nor is it all that different from Taiwanese businesses closing down their domestic production lines and moving their technology and funds to China.
The only difference is that this time around, we will see movement in Taiwan’s financial sector instead of in the corporate sector and we really cannot afford to overlook the negative impact this will have on Taiwan’s economic growth.
The government may argue that this is different to Taiwanese businesses moving their operations to China because funds from China will flow into Taiwan as a result of these new financial services. Although Chinese investment in Taiwan has been allowed for quite a few years now, what flows into Taiwan has been disproportionate to what flows to China. Even more worrying is that what flows from Taiwan into China are productive funds and financing, whereas Chinese investments in Taiwan are non-productive funds that are not helpful in improving Taiwanese industries and increasing employment, such as investments in the Taiwanese stock market and buyouts in industries such as media and distribution.
The recent inking of the agreement with the People’s Bank of China to build a yuan-clearing mechanism in Taiwan will be highly advantageous for banks, as pro-China academic and media outlets have stressed, but for the nation and its small and medium enterprises, it will be a huge disadvantage.
Huang Tien-lin is a former presidential adviser.
Translated by Drew Cameron
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with