“A head of state being heckled is not a big deal in a democratic society; there is no need to regard it as losing face.”
These were the words of then-Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in October 2006, spoken at the time of a campaign by red-clad protesters to oust then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party.
Fast-forward to Monday this week and Ma’s stance has changed noticeably now that he is the president and on the receiving end of people’s anger and discontent. Seeing his speech marking Human Rights Day at the Jingmei Human Rights Memorial and Cultural Park disturbed by protesters — one of whom also threw a shoe at Ma — Ma appeared annoyed and raised his voice as he lectured all those present, in his message on human rights, that “it is the attitude of tolerance and mutual respect that serves as the fundamental value in Taiwan’s human rights development.”
The shoe-throwing episode reminded many people of a similar incident involving then-US president George W. Bush in December 2008 at a news conference in Baghdad, Iraq. Many recalled how Bush took it in his stride, saying that the shoe thrown at him was “a size 10.”
Even Chen, in comparison with Ma, appeared to be more mature and demonstrated a level of graciousness and class befitting a president when he, in the face of people protesting and heckling him, stated that the ruckus was a sign of a healthy democracy in Taiwan that people should cherish and be proud of.
As the president whose ill-conceived policies and poor performance fueled recent public demonstrations of grievances and dissatisfaction, Ma should be more receptive to people’s criticism, rather than fighting the protesters’ decibels with more decibels, as was the case on Monday.
In his speech, Ma called for respect from the protesters. However, does he practice what he preaches and treat his people with the respect they are due? Recalling the numerous demonstrations held by members of the public these past months on issues such as fuel and electricity price increases, forced land seizures and deteriorating social insurance systems, to name just a few, how many were the times that all that the people got in response from Ma were the words “thank you”? Ma’s lecture about respect was anything but convincing, as the public has on many occasions witnessed how he fails to respect his people by treating their complaints in a perfunctory manner.
Ma also likes to pat himself on the back for having ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. However, how can he say that his administration remains determined to protect human rights and to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy when many issues remain unresolved, such as the much-criticized judiciary system that lacks independence.
In case Ma needs a reminder, he said in his victory speech on March 22, 2008, when the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regained the key to the Presidential Office: “The KMT will be appreciative and humble. We’ll listen hard, care for people’s plights, and engage in policy reviews and introspection.”
Unless he keeps the meaning of “human rights” close to his heart, takes people’s plights seriously and takes concrete action to push reforms that would change people’s lives for the better, Ma remains unqualified to give a lecture on respect, let alone on human rights.
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS