The predominantly student-based Youth Alliance Against Media Monsters helped organize protests in Taipei last week against the buyout of the Next Media Group’s four Taiwanese outlets that attracted students from all over country. This prompted the Ministry of Education’s Student Affairs Committee to e-mail a “reminder” to universities that they should “find out more about and show concern” for students who took part in the protests. The e-mail included a list of the universities whose students are members of the alliance. This attempt at intervention smacks of trying to control students and harkens back to the obscurantist government policies of the past.
The ministry’s reaction to the protests, especially the e-mail, seems to spring from a distrust of political activism and students’ participation in civil movements. The ministry appears to have characterized university students as unsophisticated, easily incited and in need of guidance. On the surface, the part of the e-mail that voiced apprehension over the students’ health, given last week’s “changeable weather,” could be seen as a legitimate concern, but neither the students nor the wider society are likely to read it that way. The draconian thought-control measures employed in Taiwan’s authoritarian past are far too recent to allow for such naivete.
Educational authorities have long adopted a patriarchal approach toward students, but the concern expressed in the e-mail was more about social order, and this anxiety has led them to attempt to discourage students from taking part in protests. Adults themselves are not sure what these complex issues imply, or what they want their outcome to be, so they do not want students meddling in affairs beyond their textbooks and classes in a way that they cannot control. This is why they have attempted to stop student movements from developing. Even reportedly liberal institutions have shown a tendency for such shortsighted actions, such as National Taiwan University’s request last month for the police to clamp down on any protests on campus.
The growing conservativeness among educational authorities will not help cultivate critical thinking in university students; it will only produce compliant citizens who do not question the powers that be.
Freedom of speech, freedom of the press and censorship are important social issues that deserve to be debated at all levels of society. Student movements may lack sophistication or maturity of thought, but it is precisely because of this deficiency, and because of their idealism, that they can be the perfect antidote to social stagnation and corruption. Student movements have other qualities — passion, impetuousness and forthrightness — that allow them to dare to challenge the establishment and entrenched ideas, and to push for reform. Student movements may make mistakes, but all the mistakes made to date have just been part of the learning process. These experiences will teach them much about how better to communicate and refine their ideas and how to compromise. Members of the 1960s hippy movement in the US, and of the Wild Lillies and Wild Strawberries movements in Taiwan, have gone from protesting to reforming to becoming active members of society.
Hundreds of students gathered last week outside the Fair Trade Commission, just a stone’s throw from the ministry. If the ministry was so concerned for the students’ health, why did Minister of Education Chiang Wei-ling (蔣偉寧) not simply remind them to bring waterproof gear, instead of asking universities to “show concern” for those taking part in the protest?
Chiang could at least have taken a leaf from the book of one of his predecessors, Cheng Jei-cheng (鄭瑞城) who, in 2008, not only sent ministry officials to talk to protesters, but went in person to meet the students taking part in the Wild Strawberries Movement protests. Cheng showed actions speak louder than e-mails.
US President Donald Trump on Thursday issued executive orders barring Americans from conducting business with WeChat owner Tencent Holdings and ByteDance, the Beijing-based owner of popular video-sharing app TikTok. The orders are to take effect 45 days after they were signed, which is Sept. 20. The orders accuse WeChat of helping the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) review and remove content that it considers to be politically sensitive, and of using fabricated news to benefit itself. The White House has accused TikTok of collecting users’ information, location data and browsing histories, which could be used by the Chinese government, and pose
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) at a ceremony on July 30 officially commissioned China’s BeiDou-3 satellite navigation system. The constellation of satellites, which is now fully operational, was completed six months ahead of schedule. Its deployment means that the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is now in possession of an autonomous, global satellite navigation system to rival the US’ GPS, Russia’s Glonass and the EU’s Galileo. Although Chinese officials have repeatedly sought to reassure the world that BeiDou-3 is primarily a civilian and commercial platform, US and European military experts beg to differ. Teresa Hitchens, a senior research associate at the University of
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) this week came under fire over his speech at a Rotary Club meeting in Taipei on Monday, when he said that Beijing’s military strategy toward Taiwan was “to let the first battle be the last.” If China started a cross-strait war, it would end quickly, without time for other nations to react, he said in his “Cross-Strait Relations and Taiwan Security” address, criticizing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for saying that she hoped other nations would come to Taiwan’s aid in Beijing’s first wave of attacks. A president should prevent war from happening, not talk about how
There are few areas where Beijing, Taipei, and Washington find themselves in agreement these days, but one of them is that the situation in the Taiwan Strait is growing more dangerous. Such a shared assessment quickly breaks down, though, when the question turns to identifying sources of rising tensions. Several Chinese experts and officials I have consulted with recently have argued that Beijing’s increasingly belligerent behavior in the Taiwan Strait is driven mostly by fear. According to this narrative, Beijing is worried that unless it puts a brake on Taiwan’s move away from the mainland, Taiwan could be “lost” forever. They