Within minutes of eurozone finance ministers reaching a deal to cut Greece’s debt late on Monday, commentators on Twitter were dismissing it as another exercise in “kicking the can down the road.”
To an extent that is true. Under the agreement, the eurozone and the IMF will give Greece two more years to reach its budget goals and will find another 44 billion euros (US$57 billion) to keep the country afloat in the meantime.
However, while a degree of can-kicking may be going on, there was a critical element in Monday night’s deal that goes a lot further than any other step taken so far in the debt crisis to get Greece back on its feet.
Implicit was an understanding that Greece will undergo some form of official sector debt restructuring — with eurozone countries forgiving a portion of Greece’s debt — at some point in the future, the sort of last-ditch measure usually reserved for impoverished states in Africa and Latin America.
At a news conference in the early hours of Tuesday, German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble came closer than he has ever done before to publicly acknowledging that creditors face such an eventuality — a move that will be very hard for the likes of Germany, Finland, Austria and the Netherlands to take.
“When Greece has achieved, or is set to achieve, a primary surplus and fulfilled all of its conditions, we will, if need be, consider further measures for the reduction of the total debt,” he said, looking weary after 13 hours of negotiations.
The timing and reference to a primary surplus are important.
The Greek economy is forecast to return to growth during 2014 and to achieve a primary budget surplus — the balance before deducting the cost of debt financing — of 4.5 percent of GDP in 2016.
By the end of that year, the EU-IMF assistance program should be over and Greece will in theory be on its own, financing itself in the financial markets in the normal way.
Monday night’s deal took care of the extra financing Greece will need between 2014 and 2016 and set out a series of steps the eurozone and Greece will take to get its debt level down from about 190 percent of GDP next year to 124 percent by 2020.
However, what it did not set out in precise detail is how Greek debt will go on falling, from 124 percent of GDP in 2020 to 110 percent in 2022 and 88 percent in 2030, as agreed during the talks.
It did not say how Greece is expected to win back market confidence in 2016 even though its debt level that year is still expected to be 175 percent of GDP.
The answer is a combination of lower interest rates and longer maturities being applied to loans to Greece, as well as Athens paying down more of its own debt thanks to growth and the potential for eurozone states to write down their loans.
“Euro area member states will consider further measures and assistance, including lower co-financing in structural funds and/or a further rate reduction in the Greek loan facility if necessary,” EU Commissioner for Economic and Monetary Affairs and the Euro Olli Rehn said, again hinting at the possibility of a more fundamental overhaul of debt in the future.
An EU official closely involved in the discussions on Greece said there was a general unwillingness among eurozone countries to acknowledge that they may have to forgive some of the 127 billion euros they have so far lent to Greece, even if all of them know the issue cannot be avoided forever.
In order to make Greece’s debt sustainable in the long term, the IMF has determined that it must be cut to about 120 percent by 2020 and 110 percent by 2022. However, there is no guarantee that those levels will be sustainable on those dates.
As a result, the prospect of a debt writedown has to remain, especially as the eurozone countries, who will soon be responsible for about three-quarters of all Greek debt, have said time and again that they will do what is necessary to keep Greece afloat and in the eurozone.
The EU official said the best option would be for eurozone countries to bite the bullet and write down 40 billion to 50 billion euros of loans to Greece in 2016 or shortly afterward, so that its debt-to-GDP ratio is aggressively reduced and the country can more easily return to financial markets.
However, that is unlikely to happen, since no member state wants to write down any Greek debt, the cost of which would be born by taxpayers. Each state will do everything possible to ensure that any writedown, if it must happen, is as small as possible.
“If you were really going to help Greece, you’d write off enough debt to get the ratio down to 60 percent of GDP, which is a decently sustainable level,” the official said. “But that’s never going to happen. No one’s going to buy that.”
Instead, the possibility of debt forgiveness will hang over the eurozone for the next four years and will, whether countries like it or not, have to be tackled at some point.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with