Information, not spin required
Even after the Executive Yuan publicized it via TV advertisements last month, I still cannot understand what the “Economic Power-up Plan” is.
In fact, the advertisements received a huge wave of criticism.
The advertisement said it is hard to only use a few sentences to describe the plan, and the point seemed to be that the government is “saying little but doing more.”
What awful propaganda to publicize this as being relevant to people’s livelihoods.
My friend recently got laid off from her job at a food factory. Luckily, she can survive for a while by drawing on her release pay.
She never thinks of being jobless though, and told me: “I am not as senseless as government officials.”
I sensed, though, that she felt helpless while talking to me.
A workforce training program was put in place last year by the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA), which offers subsidies to firms retraining the jobless.
I found out about this program completely by accident two days ago and told my friend about it.
Where could she get information, and how could she apply, she asked me.
I told her that the CLA provides a variety of training programs for both the employed and the jobless, and that by going to the Web site of the training center of the Bureau of Employment and Vocational Training she could find more details.
She immediately went to the Web site and found the information she needed.
She left with a smile on her face because she had found her next step.
Should I feel renewed hope or should I instead feel fear as I realize that only a minority of workers know about this program?
I do not know whether the “Economic Power-up Plan” can stimulate Taiwan’s economy to keep it growing, but one thing I do know is that one part of this plan, workforce training, really meets workers’ needs.
The CLA arranges a variety of training programs to promote workers’ skills, thus meeting the needs of the labor market.
Launching the “Economic Power-up Plan” in September, the Executive Yuan has just integrated several cross-ministry policies into one “new” plan.
If we take time to examine this plan, we will find many programs pre-existing it.
Taiwanese do not need the government to waste time creating a new name for what is essentially just combining old programs together.
They need the government to tell the public what resources are already available to them.
It is also unnecessary for the government to spend extra money publicizing its “new” policies through TV adverts.
In terms of past experiences, people might not be able to see the real situation when they are in a superior position.
If government officials could just listen to people’s needs, then the situation could be improved.
It is a pity to see that such a potentially good plan cannot be understood by the public and that the government’s efforts are in vain.
Chang Shin-ping
New Taipei City
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with