Pro-lifers all about control
In a rather appalling attempt to stir up some controversy, the Taipei Times gave an ardent pro-lifer print space (Letter, Nov. 14, page 8), instead of supporting female reproductive rights.
Pro-life attitudes are the leftover expression of male dominance over women.
For thousands of years, most cultures subjugated women so that men could use them as they pleased. Luckily, with the rise of modern democracy and human rights, women have managed to reclaim their bodies from male subjugation in many countries.
The pro-life movement was recently rejected even by the relatively conservative US electorate, and all around the world there is a trend for reproductive rights and family planning to be integral parts of democratic governments that uphold human rights, as well as sensible population policies.
As primatologist Jane Goodall, who recently visited Taiwan has pointed out, controlling population growth is one part of the equation to reduce the environmental footprint of humanity, the other being curbing reckless over-consumption.
In this context, it is interesting to note that most pro-lifers have no interest in protecting the environmental well-being of babies once they are born, as they usually oppose any government regulations to protect the environment.
And yes, Mister Misogynist, abortion is just like having a tooth removed, because the baby is an integral part of the mother’s body until it is born, and it could not survive without the mother’s body.
So the next time you deny me the rights to my womb and the rights of all the other women on this planet, I will call for the removal of all men’s testicles, because then we will have solved the problem of abortion once and for all.
So stay out of my womb.
Flora Faun
Taipei
Living in a desensitized world
Recently, I read an opinion piece in the Taipei Times (“China’s liberals indifferent to Tibetan suffering,” Nov. 14, page 9), that discussed the apathy that Han Chinese feel toward Tibetans self-immolating. I have followed this story for a while and I understand the issues involved. It is quite sad to see the Chinese government fail to address this issue.
However, the concept of people ignoring a particular issue is not only plaguing China.
After seeing a Jewish friend of mine post an online comment about how Israel and Gaza have been going at it recently, I realized that most people will just browse over her status update — some might comment, others might “like” it — but ultimately most people will just feel saddened, then move on. They will go on to “LOL” at the next status or meme, then “like” a picture and possibly post one of their favorite songs online.
My point is that we can sit here and criticize the Chinese for being totally oblivious to the Tibetan situation, but when we take a good hard look at ourselves, we are doing the same thing in our everyday lives.
We are a desensitized population that ignores the wrongs in life if they do not directly affect us.
God forbid if China ever does attack Taiwan, because if I post the news on Facebook, the people who “like” my status or comment on it will not help me one bit.
If people want China to address the Tibetan issue, then they should also ask other governments to address other issues that are just as pressing.
Harry Adamopoulos
Taipei
KMT’s disturbing US pull
A week ago, I happened to be in Taipei, so I stopped by the Presbyterian church near Taipei Main Station. There was a cage there representing the confines of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁). I stepped inside to get a feel and was roundly cursed at in perfectly good English by some doddering old coot.
If that is really what his cell was like — there is barely enough room to lie dow — then it is a good thing Chen is short.
In the US, embezzlers are put in “Club Fed,” not a dog cage. Could there not be a cell somewhere in between, in terms of amenities?
Also, regarding the story in Friday’s Taipei Times about Chen Chih-chung’s (陳致中) houses in the US being confiscated (“US seizes houses bought by Chen Shui-bian’s family,” Nov. 16, page 1), something sounds fishy to me.
Taiwan is not even a “real” country, at least not by UN standards.
The US Department of Justice is busy confiscating the property of drug lords and embezzlers of “real” countries.
Does it really have the time to waste on alleged embezzlers? Do they not have bigger fish to fry? And how does the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) have the political pull to make the US do its bidding?
Has Taiwan not become irrelevant since China is now the goose with the golden egg?
I love Taiwan. It is a very real country to me. I only say this because it is not a member of the UN — the authority on “real” countries. I do not say this to put down the lovely “Ilha Formosa.”
You are welcome to print this letter. Or if not, I would at least like a somewhat clearer editorial about how this situation is even possible. It really seems ridiculous.
Shervin Marsh
Luodong, Yilan County
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China