According to reports from many media outlets, Jo Sung-gyu, deputy head of North Korea’s Tourism Bureau, led a delegation on a five-day visit to Taiwan to discuss with Taiwanese tourism industry representatives the possibility of setting up direct flights between Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport and Pyongyang in North Korea during Korean festivals.
Surprisingly, Taiwan’s national security agencies were apparently unaware that officials from a controversial communist state were visiting Taiwan. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs had to admit that Taiwan’s representative office in Singapore had not reported the visit to the ministry in a timely manner when issuing tourist visas to the delegation members. This situation makes it clear that communication channels between the government’s national security units are flawed, and that a thorough review and improvements are urgently needed.
Following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in the US, the international security environment changed drastically. This made it vital that diplomatic and national defense policies complement each other to safeguard national security.
Based on this “new world view,” the national security systems of some advanced countries have strengthened their intelligence information gathering and defense information analysis in an effort to prevent terrorist attacks and to counter other threats. They also set up complete crisis management mechanisms to enhance communication between different government units.
The main purpose of these measures is to prevent potential crises and to stop them if they do occur. This is the only way that a government can secure both public and national safety.
North Korea is a totalitarian state, and its nuclear threat remains one of the biggest variables currently affecting global security. Although the future development of the North Korean tourism industry is highly attractive to Taiwan, Jo, who has already visited Taiwan with his subordinates three times, remains a high-ranking North Korean official.
Although the visits were of a non-official character and aimed at generating business, the ministry should have been proactive and should have immediately obtained the schedule for his Taiwanese visits and informed national security units that they should pay close attention to the visits.
This would have been the correct way of handling the situation and it would have dispelled any public doubts.
Earlier this month, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) failed to identify a photograph of Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Jia Qinglin (賈慶林), who is responsible for China’s Taiwan affairs. Subsequently, Taiwan’s representative office in Singapore failed to report Jo’s visit in a timely manner. Not long ago, the Ministry of National Defense was unaware of President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) plan for an East China Sea peace initiative (東海和平倡議), and its rash punishment of Rear Admiral Chang Feng-chiang (張鳳強), former commander of the navy’s 168th Fleet, was also strongly criticized across the board.
All these cases demonstrate that serious loopholes exist in Taiwan’s intelligence reporting and communication mechanisms.
If these warning signs are not given the attention they deserve, then there is serious cause for concern over the state of Taiwan’s national security.
Yao Chung-yuan is a strategy consultant to the Association for Managing Defense and Strategies.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with