The actions of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration since the beginning of Ma’s second term show how much ill-will officials with a false sense of urgency can generate in only five months.
Following his re-election, Ma wasted no time in announcing fuel and electricity price hikes, saying price subsidies were wrong and could cause the closure of state-owned Taipower and CPC Corp, Taiwan, as well as jeopardizing efforts to reduce carbon emissions.
A defiant Ma decided that his reform plan was correct and ignored public calls to tackle poor management before raising prices. The results were a general rise in commodity prices and a “misery index” — the sum of the unemployment rate and the inflation rate — of 7.82 at the end of August. This was the highest among the four Asian Tigers of South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan.
With his credibility and approval ratings dropping to their lowest levels since his first inauguration in 2008 and the opposition’s initiation of a motion of no confidence against the Cabinet, Ma again felt the need for urgent change.
He appointed a pair of confidants to key positions — King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) as representative to the US and Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) as Mainland Affairs Council minister — but left unpopular and controversial officials in charge of economic affairs.
The “presidential legacy” of developing sound relations with Beijing and “the best relationship with the US in six decades” — rather than tackling the sluggishness in Taiwan’s economy — was what was on Ma’s mind with his latest personnel decisions, analysts said.
Feeling the heat about a lack of economic progress, Ma was prompted by a fresh urge to do something spectacular. The Executive Yuan would turn round the domestic economic situation and work to bring about the “sensible economy” the Cabinet had pledged within 30 days, Ma said on Sept. 24.
His administration was not so urgent about workers’ salary levels returning to where they were 13 years ago, with Premier Sean Chen (陳冲) holding off a recommended minimum monthly wage increase of a mere NT$267.
Let’s also not forget about the Control Yuan, which is tasked with monitoring the other branches of government but appears to have done everything but its designated task.
Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊) has been criticized for his behavior, including hosting a wedding banquet at the Control Yuan’s assembly hall and commenting on topics such as filial piety and sexual positions. His sense of urgency on everything but monitoring government agencies has also been noted.
Rather than a lack of urgency, it is the false sense of urgency which seems to affect government officials that raises concern, because this administration has not only failed to address people’s needs but has also arrogantly assumed that it was thinking two steps ahead. This has almost come to a point where the government would be embarrassed if it implemented policies demanded by the opposition and the Taiwanese people.
While we should not expect this pattern to change overnight, the country will be in deep trouble if the government does not stand on the same side as, and think like, the Taiwanese people, as Ma promised during his presidential campaign.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with