President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) recent series of absurd activities in relation to the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台) issue are as sudden and unexpected as they are farcical.
First, he played with fire when he allowed Coast Guard Administration vessels to escort Taiwanese vessels flying the Chinese national flag to the Diaoyutais in July.
After that, the Republic of China (ROC) flag appeared on the islands in a joint action with Hong Kong activists. On the one hand, the government tried to distance itself from the action, saying it had played no part in it, while on the other, it issued a public statement saying that the ROC flag being flown on islands which had been “stolen” and occupied by Japan was in line with the government’s position. Ma is handling matters of national importance by avoiding issues and trying to hide his involvement.
In an interview with the Japanese national broadcaster NHK on Aug. 20, Ma surprised everyone by saying he wanted to launch an “initiative” to submit the Diaoyutai issue to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to find a resolution.
According to the Statute of the ICJ, the court’s jurisdiction only extends to special agreements between parties to the statute, to issues explicitly stipulated in other international agreements, or to issues on which parties to the statute have agreed to accept the court’s jurisdiction in relation to any other state accepting the same obligation — this is the so-called “optional compulsory jurisdiction” clause in Article 36 of the statute.
According to the UN Charter, only UN members can become parties to the statute. Non-UN members shall be recommended by the UN Security Council and approved by the General Assembly to become parties to the statute.
In other words, submitting the Diaoyutai sovereignty issue to the ICJ requires a special agreement between China and Japan. Taiwan will not even be allowed in as an observer. Ma’s suggestion, then, is an evisceration of Taiwan’s sovereignty. Is he perhaps helping China by trying to sound out the Japanese? The reason I am asking is that on July 10, an article included in the e-mail newsletter from Japanese newspaper Yomiuri Shimbun quoted government sources as saying that the Japanese government will not consider submitting the case to a UN agency for resolution because asking the ICJ to resolve the issue would be tantamount to Japan recognizing that there is a dispute over these islands, which is what China wants. The article also said that even if China were to submit the case to the court, Japan will not dance to China’s tune. There is a reason for Ma’s statement, but one can only guess at his intentions.
On Sept. 7, Ma traveled to Pengjia Islet (彭佳嶼) to view the Diaoyutais from a great distance. There is of course nothing wrong with the nation’s leader inspecting national territory, but how can he claim that such childish games constitute a “clever declaration of sovereignty”? Ma’s choice of Pengjia as a place to make a declaration of sovereignty makes it clear that Taiwan does not exercise effective control over the Diaoyutais as required by international law. That raises doubts over Taiwan’s qualifications to claim sovereignty over the islands, yet he revels in the illusion that three sets of bilateral talks to be followed by one set of trilateral talks will help raise Taiwan’s international profile.
Leaving China’s reaction aside, Japan’s foreign minister rejected Ma’s “East China Sea peace initiative” as early as Aug. 7, in what was effectively a slap in the face for Ma.
After Ma landed on Pengjia and announced his program, the Japanese newspaper Sankei Shimbun said the only reason Ma continued to issue statements regarding the Diaoyutais issue was that he wants to feel that Taiwan remains part of the East China Sea issue. Japanese authorities have always rejected the view that there is a dispute, and Ma will not succeed in drawing a Japanese response.
This being the case, Ma should know when to step back. Neither Japan nor China will sit down with him to discuss setting aside the East China Sea sovereignty dispute for the sake of joint development of the region. The handling of international affairs is an art form that requires both wisdom and realism. Ma should approach the issue cautiously and with an open mind.
Chen Rong-jye is a legal academic and former secretary-general of the Straits Exchange Foundation.
Translated by Perry Svensson
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS