The London 2012 Olympic Games have captivated the entire world, yet the UK’s political endeavors which have driven the successful event behind the scenes have received scant appraisal.
The Rome 1960 Olympic Games and the Tokyo 1964 Olympic Games allowed both nations to remove themselves from the dark shadow of defeat after having lost World War II. When Seoul hosted the Summer Olympics in 1988, it provided a huge impetus for the democratization of South Korea, which was part of a global third wave of democratization. When Athens hosted the Summer Olympics in 2004, however, the Greek government invested 8 billion euros (NT$297 billion) in the event, an investment that helped drive the country to bankruptcy five years later. For the 2008 Beijing Olympics, the Chinese government also invested huge amounts of capital in the Games in an attempt to create an image of itself as a peacefully ascending global power, but despite the effort, China’s tainted international image remains.
On the other hand, when looking at the ongoing London Olympics, one notices that a few years ago the British government began to integrate policies of sustainable development, cutting carbon emissions and environmental protection into its domestic and foreign policies.
The London Olympics is one link in this visionary policy effort and it offers a great opportunity to observe the success of the UK’s foreign policy in action. Aside from establishing the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the British government has sent a roving ambassador on a global lobbying mission to promote and participate in international climate change affairs and events.
In terms of building these policies into the London Olympics, the UK also established the Commission for a Sustainable London 2012 five years ago. Some of the more noticeable achievements of these policies include how the Olympic Park, the event’s primary sporting complex, was built on a brownfield site in east London which was transformed into an environmentally sustainable, green site that will eventually be developed into a grand eco-friendly green space for Londoners in the future.
Some of the less apparent achievements of the policy include the introduction of grants to London taxi drivers five years ago, renewing the city’s whole taxi fleet to fuel-efficient gasoline-electric hybrid engines to reduce pollution. Some of the sporting venues were constructed using environmentally friendly materials that can be taken down after the Olympics and reused. In addition, the Olympic Park has also adopted strict measures calling for low-carbon emissions, zero pollution and boosting recycling — all of which make London 2012 the “greenest” Olympics in history.
The opening ceremony of London 2012 gave us a glimpse of the country’s glorious past, including the era of the British Empire. The UK might not be as powerful and prosperous as it once was, but through a transformation of its foreign policy, the country has succeeded in using the Olympics as a platform to promote its ideals internationally.
Compared with the exorbitant amount of money that both China and Greece spent when they hosted the Olympic Games, several times the amount spent by London, the London Games are a major political and foreign policy achievement for the UK and that is something it would serve Taiwan well to learn from.
Liu Shih-chung is director of the research center at the Taipei-based Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Kyle Jeffcoat
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with